The Raven

The Raven (http://raven.theraider.net/index.php)
-   Films (http://raven.theraider.net/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   The Dark Knight Rises (http://raven.theraider.net/showthread.php?t=16357)

jonesissparrow 08-14-2008 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No Ticket
This is true. But come on.... who wouldn't want to try and use Joker if they could.


Yeah you couldn't stay away from Joker, he is just as or more so iconic than Batman himself and Two Face is hard to resist as well.

You know I like the Mad Hatter idea and wish Nolan. I honestly think if I was in Nolan's shoes is bring in Catwoman anyway simply to create a lust for Bruce since Rachel died and everything and he turns his sorrow into more revenge and lust, that itself would make an interesting film.

Agent Spalko 08-14-2008 09:53 PM

The Joker is the quintessential Batman villain. Even if spite of Ledger's death, the Joker would still have been a huge box-office draw. You just can't top the Joker. The third film will suffer noticeably because of this fact. Doesn't mean it won't be good, just not AS good.

No Ticket 08-14-2008 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonesissparrow
Yeah you couldn't stay away from Joker, he is just as or more so iconic than Batman himself and Two Face is hard to resist as well.

You know I like the Mad Hatter idea and wish Nolan. I honestly think if I was in Nolan's shoes is bring in Catwoman anyway simply to create a lust for Bruce since Rachel died and everything and he turns his sorrow into more revenge and lust, that itself would make an interesting film.


I think Catwoman is a bad idea. Mainly because I think it would be more interesting to see Bruce dealing with loneliness and shutting himself off and going full-on Batman as Rachel predicted. Since she said she could now tell he couldn't give that up.

I mean, since he has nothing left Batman is all he has.

Agent Spalko 08-14-2008 09:58 PM

He still has Alfred.

WillKill4Food 08-14-2008 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No Ticket
I mean, since he has nothing left Batman is all he has.

He has Alfred, so it's not like he has no family. I think that Catwoman could work, and I also think the Riddler and Penguin could work, but I don't see the Mad Hatter as a serious villain.

EDIT: Spalko you beat me to it.

No Ticket 08-14-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent Spalko
He still has Alfred.


True. But Alfred is all he has now. It might even be interesting to see him punish himself for what happened to Rachel by making himself as lonely as possible.

Actually I didn't think it through. He also has Lucius Fox. But I like the idea of Mad Hatter kidnapping him (which he did in the comics) and this giving Bruce the feeling that he may lose someone else close to him. Same goes for Gordon.

Oh wait he has Gordon too, sort of.

lol.... well there goes my theory. But I could see him not getting close to women.

Agent Spalko 08-14-2008 10:28 PM

He's already punishing himself over the death of his parents. As Alfred says, "You spat in the face of Gotham's criminals. Did you not think there might be some casualties?" Her death only furthers his anguish to fight injustice. That's what Batman stands for.

Crusade>Raiders 08-14-2008 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent Spalko
Agreed. He's just wrapped up in bandages, a trenchcoat and carries two guns. He's a poor man's Darkman.


When I first read Hush I was like "Wait, the new character introduced in the story arc is also the new bad guy? I saw this coming from the second issue...there has to be some twist." Turns there wasn't. Dude is just some guy with guns, and bandages because all Batman's rogues have be twisted or scared or some crap.

THAT said, Paul Dini is doing a fine job trying to make him a good character with his current Detective Comics run.

Pale Horse 08-15-2008 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No Ticket
I like the idea of Mad Hatter more though. A pedophile who is obsessed with the darker aspects of Alice in Wonderland. Perhaps he has been on the loose and killed children? ...


As a Lewis Carroll pandit, this would be truly chilling. The depths of his works combined with the endopsychic propoganda that could be realized....wow.

WillKill4Food 08-15-2008 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pale Horse
As a Lewis Carroll pandit, this would be truly chilling. The depths of his works combined with the endopsychic propoganda that could be realized....wow.

Sure, but I think that pedophilia may be too dark a subject matter. :eek:

The Man 08-15-2008 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WillKill4Food
Sure, but I think that pedophilia may be too dark a subject matter. :eek:


Indeed. It ain't standard summer fare, that's for sure...

sandiegojones 08-15-2008 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WillKill4Food
Sure, but I think that pedophilia may be too dark a subject matter. :eek:

It would be more extreme than the Joker though if they want to top him!

WillKill4Food 08-15-2008 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandiegojones
It would be more extreme than the Joker though if they want to top him!

Yeah, but damn. You wanna talk about giving kids nightmares? Pedophilia sure as hell would.

Anyway, I'm curious, how exactly would Batman be tough fighting a pedophile? When I think of pedophiles, I think of fat losers with mangy beards and taped-up circular glasses that live in their mom's basements and fondle the neighborhood kids.
Doesn't sound much like a fight to me...

Pale Horse 08-15-2008 04:24 PM

obscure the crime, by showing the victimized children as brainwashed agents dolling out the evil....Leave the "sexuality" out of it...

It further villian-izes Batman, if he punishes the children for commiting crimes.

(yeah, I'm pretty twisted :eek:)

jonesissparrow 08-15-2008 06:51 PM

This conversation of the Mad Hatter really reminds me of a Sherlock Holmes movie in 1945 called the Woman in Green which has a plot which would be perfect for the third movie if they use the Mad Hatter or the Riddler.

The whole style and film noir in this Holmes mystrey is similar to the two Batman films.




The Man 08-16-2008 06:44 AM

The usual suspects..?

http://www.mansfieldnewsjournal.com/...NMENT/80816017

Quote:

“Dark Knight” director Chris Nolan has not committed to another sequel, but Warner Bros. says it’s eager to get started. And the key to “Dark Knight”’s record-breaking box office is clearly its villain: Heath Ledger’s Joker.

Quote:

Fans are speculating about whom the Caped Crusader should face next time. Most agree it’s time to get some formidable women in the mix.

Quote:

The Riddler. An iconic villain played to campy excess by Frank Gorshin and Jim Carrey. It’s possible Nolan could bring fame back to Edward Nigma. “Audiences give Nolan the benefit of the doubt,” says Blair Butler of G4TV. “He made Two-Face a serious criminal again. Why not Riddler?”

Quote:

Ventriloquist and Scarface. Meek ventriloquist Arnold Wesker begins to take orders from his dummy, Scarface, to murder his enemies. “It’s a very creepy scenario, and Chris would have to walk that line carefully,” says Garth Franklin of the movie fan site Dark Horizons. “After all, it’s a guy running around with a doll.”

Quote:

“You really can’t have too fanciful a villain in Chris Nolan’s universe,” says Rob Worley of Comics2Film.com. “Anything too science-fiction-y isn’t going to fit in his hard-core take of Batman. He likes something that’s going to fit in the real world.”

TheMutt92 08-16-2008 08:26 AM

http://www.variety.com/article/VR111...goryid=13&cs=1

Briefly discusses DC comics future on film and reiterrates what has to happen for Batman 3.

sandiegojones 08-16-2008 04:00 PM

Gotham City 90210:

http://splashpage.mtv.com/2008/08/12...ddler-casting/

HAhahaHAHahAhAHahahAHAHahahahAha!!!!

Can you believe this douche is married to the hot chick (Megan Fox) from Transformers too!

No Ticket 08-16-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pale Horse
obscure the crime, by showing the victimized children as brainwashed agents dolling out the evil....Leave the "sexuality" out of it...

It further villian-izes Batman, if he punishes the children for commiting crimes.

(yeah, I'm pretty twisted :eek:)



Yes, it wouldn't ever SHOW him as a pedophile. It would be something like...

Gordon (throws photos down for Batman to see): "That's all I can give you. His real name is ___ and he was a computer programmer at blah blah blah" (I don't know his real name lol)... "he's a sociopath and a pedophile..."

Batman: "Pedophile?"

Gordon: "Yes. Apparently obsessed with the book Alice in Wonderland, that's why he calls himself the Mad Hatter. He likes to kidnap children with the name of "Alice." (Said with slight disgust)


You never need to see the crime itself. Just need to know what he is.

Pale Horse 08-18-2008 01:37 PM

Yep, that's the classic Hitchcock technique...or at least the one credited to him.

Shortie 08-18-2008 09:02 PM

Mad Hatter would be a let down after Joker.

I think Killer Croc would be cool. But since The Lizard is no doubt going to be in Spider-Man 4, he'll seem like a rip-off. Which he sort of is, since Lizard was one of Spidey's first villains. Though the backgrounds are completely different.

He'd definately be different form any Batman villain so far.

No Ticket 08-18-2008 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shortie
Mad Hatter would be a let down after Joker.

I think Killer Croc would be cool. But since The Lizard is no doubt going to be in Spider-Man 4, he'll seem like a rip-off. Which he sort of is, since Lizard was one of Spidey's first villains. Though the backgrounds are completely different.

He'd definately be different form any Batman villain so far.


You're missing the point of Nolan's world being more realistic. Killer Croc, a man-crocodile really doesn't work as well in that world because it would essentially have to be CG, I would think.

RocketSledFight 08-19-2008 11:35 AM

Dark Knight script just went up on joblo: http://joblo.com/scripts/The_Dark_Knight.pdf

Great read, answers two questions I had, namely what does the Joker do after dropping Rachel out of the window at the party, and is Dent truly dead?

Pale Horse 08-19-2008 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shortie
Mad Hatter would be a let down after Joker.....



Obviously, you haven't been exposed to the terror of psychological warfare propogated by children.

Shortie 08-20-2008 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No Ticket
You're missing the point of Nolan's world being more realistic. Killer Croc, a man-crocodile really doesn't work as well in that world because it would essentially have to be CG, I would think.

Yeah, I guess. But it would be different from anything we've seen so far in both series. ('90s & Nolan)

Riddler & Catwoman are the way to go!

Jonesy9906753 08-21-2008 12:12 AM

catwomans a very cheesy and horrible villainess to begin with i wouldnt be able to bare to see her again after that disasterpiece "Catwoman" came out,and riddler could possibly work but they need the right actor and the right story for him to fit in,it'd be interesting to see how Nolan have his take on the riddler,and i really hope they dont replace Ledger,its not necessary,we're all well aware what happens to the joker in TDK and that should be the end of it since Heath passed away,rest his soul. he gave the best performance of the Joker an actor could give and replacing him would be like when they replaced Brandon Lee in the Crow series

Shortie 08-21-2008 12:15 AM

Nolan can do wonders with her. I mean it's basically BM but as a cat & a girl. Scarecrow isn't that great either.

DocWhiskey 08-21-2008 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonesy9906753
catwomans a very cheesy and horrible villainess to begin with i wouldnt be able to bare to see her again after that disasterpiece "Catwoman" came out,and riddler could possibly work but they need the right actor and the right story for him to fit in,it'd be interesting to see how Nolan have his take on the riddler,and i really hope they dont replace Ledger,its not necessary,we're all well aware what happens to the joker in TDK and that should be the end of it since Heath passed away,rest his soul. he gave the best performance of the Joker an actor could give and replacing him would be like when they replaced Brandon Lee in the Crow series


Catwoman could be a great character when she has a great writer behind her. Don't judge her by that dreadful Halle Berry Cat-tastrophe. Burton made her interesting back in Batman Returns. Catwoman carries her own comic series, and it's quite good actually. But frankly I'm not all for her in Batman 3. But I would be more interested in Wayne and Selina Kyle's relationship. I really think the Riddler should be a shoe in for Batman 3. He's the thinking man of Batman rogues gallery. And with Nolan's previous projects like The Prestige, Memento, and Insomnia, it shows he's great at psychological thrillers and throwing in twists. So The Riddler would not only be great story wise, but his look is realistic like Nolan's Gotham i.e. A man in a green suit.

Oh, and I agree that Ledger shouldn't be replaced and they should just move on. The reason Brandon Lee was "replaced" as The Crow was because The Crow isn't one man. Every crow story is about a Crow bringing the soul back to an undead person who died unrighteously to exact revenge on those who wronged him. Sort of along the lines of Highlander or The Phantom. They change.

CasualJeff 08-21-2008 07:42 AM

Is there any truth to the rumor that Matthew Lesko is in talks to play the Riddler?

TheMutt92 08-21-2008 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasualJeff
Is there any truth to the rumor that Matthew Lesko is in talks to play the Riddler?


None of these castings rumors are true cause no one has even talked to Chris Nolan about the script.

Pale Horse 08-21-2008 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMutt92
None of these castings rumors are true cause no one has even talked to Chris Nolan about the script.



I hate it when a joker gets missed:

Matthew Lesko


No Ticket 08-21-2008 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMutt92
None of these castings rumors are true cause no one has even talked to Chris Nolan about the script.


Yeah, Nolan isn't even thinking about it right now. He is taking a break. I imagine he'll begin actually working on it next year if he can come up with an idea that would make a third entry worthwhile.

ResidentAlien 08-22-2008 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deckard
NEWSFLASH FOR ALL GEEKS - TWO-FACE = DEAD. Thats it. Hes dead. Deal with it. Hes not coming back I dont care how badly you want it, hes dead. You got that? Dead.

People who think the Joker and Riddler are too alike obviously aren't familiar with how Riddler has been written lately in the comics and graphic novels. They seem to only know the made up Tim Burton Riddler which is just Jim doing an over the top Gorshin impression

The real Riddler isn't all that hands on, hes not as in the open and laying down the law to the mafia crazy. He isn't trying to destroy the entire city to prove some point about the hopelessness of Gotham.

Joker is straight Looney Tunes. Maybe people didn't agree with Heath's look, but he nailed the Joker in the way he behaved.

Riddler is a genius and a whole differant kind of crazy. Hes far more reserved then Jims semi-retarded Mask impersination and for that matter then the Joker. Riddler is even more mysterious then Joker, he operates in the shadows, he uses his brain instead of rocket launchers and 18 wheelers.

Like I said alot before, Catwoman is sexy as hell but a bad idea, Two-Face and Penguin and Bane will not happen so don't get your hopes up. They aren't threatening enough to carry a sequel against Joker. Nolan already said no Catwoman, he isnt Sam Raimi and going to sumbit to some dumb fan pressure to ruin a sequel like Sam did with Venom.

Hush and Riddler. It will work, it can be as good as Joker, just as deadly, and a differant kind of feel. If you don't believe me go read Hush right now, go ahead Ill wait. If you really know Batman comics and the sources Nolan has drawn from, you cannot deny that with the situation Bats is in right now in the Nolan-verse(a criminal on the run trying to conceal his identity) these villains are perfect. Add Harvey Bullock and maybe Hugo Strange. Add the new Batcave and new Batmobile. Dark Knight can be topped, maybe not in ticket sales, but in quality. "You'll see, I'll show you."


I just picked up Hush because of this post. I'm halfway through the arc...


What are you retarded? Are you dense or something? This ain't the goddamn Batman!



UGH! Goddamn Super-dog? Really? And a new ****ing villain introduced every page it seems; this thing is a bloody mess of confused mythologies and the summer blockbuster, bigger is better syndrome. Ugh. And the real tragedy of all of this is that the artwork is absolutely beautiful. Damn shame the story is such an unmitigated mess.

...I will finish it because I've started it. But it brings me no joy. This is one of the worst comic arcs I've ever had the displeasure to read. Truly awful.

The Man 08-22-2008 01:15 PM

http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/08/...-harley-quinn/




Niteshade007 08-22-2008 04:49 PM

I like Marion Cottiliard as Catwoman, but I prefer Rhona Mitra. I've started to think that she would be perfect.

Really nicely done, however. Not wild about the idea of Harley Quinn, but, since it isn't real, it doesn't really matter, does it?

Goonie 08-22-2008 05:09 PM

I know it's not the official title, but I think Gotham City is a good title for Batman 3 (or is that 7?).

The Man 08-26-2008 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niteshade007
I like Marion Cottiliard as Catwoman, but I prefer Rhona Mitra. I've started to think that she would be perfect.


Miaow, indeed...





http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/movi..._catwoman.html

Quote:

The folks over at CinemaBlend.com came across an article by The Daily Telegraph claiming Warner Bros. is eyeing Cher as Michelle Pfeiffer's successor and the next to don Catwoman's infamous leather catsuit for the "The Dark Knight" sequel.


"If I could turn back time..."

The Man 08-26-2008 07:56 AM

http://blogs.coventrytelegraph.net/t.../batsuper.html

Quote:

WARNER BROTHERS has confirmed a third Batman adventure and a Superman reboot as well as plans to develop films for every DC comicbook character it owns, building towards a Justice League team-up movie.

Quote:

It will release four superhero films in the next three years, including a follow-up to The Dark Knight.

Niteshade007 08-26-2008 08:51 AM

Wow.

Cher? As Catwoman...different. And a terrible idea.

But hey, new Batman movie in three years is exciting. I hope that the quality doesn't suffer trying to meet that deadline. But, hey, we can't all have 19 years to perfect a movie.

The Man 08-26-2008 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niteshade007
Wow.

Cher? As Catwoman...different. And a terrible idea.



http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4669584a1860.html

Quote:

The British Telegraph newspaper said that director Christopher Nolan reportedly wants Cher to play the whip-wielding cat burglar as "a vamp in her twilight years".
:up: :up: :up:

Agent Spalko 08-26-2008 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goonie
I know it's not the official title, but I think Gotham City is a good title for Batman 3 (or is that 7?).


Gotham KNIGHT. :up:

Niteshade007 08-26-2008 12:53 PM

You actually think it's a good idea, The Man?

I can MAYBE see "a vamp in her twilight years." Maybe. But Cher? Not that I hate her, but she's just not what people are expecting. I think ultimately people will be disappointed.

A lot of people at first were opposed to Ledger playing the Joker. After some pictures came out, people complained about the costume not being right. But, from what I gather, Ledger stayed true to the essence of the Joker. He stayed true to the comic book character.

Now, perhaps there is a comic about Catwoman when she's older, but is it really what the summer flick crowd wants to see? The film's sex symbol being played by an aging singer/star? It'll disappoint. I mean, come one, people didn't think Gyllenhaal was cute enough to play the love interest, can you imagine the reaction to Cher?

The Man 08-26-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niteshade007
You actually think it's a good idea, The Man?


Oh no, but the 'fact' that Nolan wants this cracks me up...

Niteshade007 08-26-2008 12:56 PM

Yeah, I don't believe it all, but I do think it's interesting who they come up with. Honestly, I never would have guessed Cher.

The Man 08-26-2008 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niteshade007
Yeah, I don't believe it all, but I do think it's interesting who they come up with. Honestly, I never would have guessed Cher.


Now, if Lena Olin was mentioned for an older Catwoman...


"Purrfect..."

Agent Spalko 08-26-2008 02:22 PM

Cher looks younger than her and she's gotta be what, 20 years younger than Cher? Get her to a botox clinic STAT.

The Man 08-26-2008 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent Spalko
Cher looks younger than her and she's gotta be what, 20 years younger than Cher? Get her to a botox clinic STAT.


I think Lena must be in her mid-fifties by now.

The Man 08-27-2008 12:03 PM

http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/200...-nolans-story/

Quote:

Warner are waiting for Christopher Nolan to come up with a story and a plan, but the studio have said that he is taking a well deserved break and is on vacation.

Quote:

Charles Rovan, producer of The Dark Knight has said “he comes back; we will see how he feels.” Until Nolan returns we will just have to read all the rumors as to what the story will be as well as who the cast will be.

So there; all rumours be damned.

DIrishB 08-27-2008 01:27 PM

The Cher as Catwoman rumor is the stupidest ****ing thing I've heard in a long time. If that were to end up happening (which it won't, but if it did), I won't be able to tell if the weird creaking sound is coming from Catwoman's leather costume or Cher's creaky old hip joints.

Seriously, just because Cher is a "cougar", she shouldn't even be considered for Catwoman (rumor or not). Stupid.

Goodsport 08-27-2008 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent Spalko
Cher looks younger than her and she's gotta be what, 20 years younger than Cher? Get her to a botox clinic STAT.


Dollars to donuts that Cher had already beaten her to the botox clinic. :eek:


-G


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.