That is just your opinions on the matter.Z dweller said:Jeez guys, we all agree Harry is physically very fit for his age.
But that is simply not enough to play Indy.
His face refects his age 100%, and there is nothing anyone can do about that.
This was already a big problem in KOTCS, for gawds sake, and that was over 6 years ago!
Most of Harry's facial expessions in that movie came across as tired, lacking the intensity and fire required to play Indy convincingly.
Even the patented Indy smirk seemed like a bad imitation of the original.
Does it really matter if Harry is slimmer now than in 2008?
Who wants to see an old, tired looking Indy lead an action movie?
Unless of course they digitally alter his face like they did with Jeff Bridges in Tron: Legacy. Now, would you really want to see that ??
I'd rather they recast it, in fact I'm pretty sure that's what Disney are going to do at this stage.
Yep.Silvor said:That is just your opinions on the matter
And this is supposed to be an undeniable, objective truth?As I've said numerous times he could easily pass for mid fifties.
Of course not, just stating what I think.Z dweller said:Yep.
And this is supposed to be an undeniable, objective truth?
Let's agree to disagree then...Silvor said:Of course not, just stating what I think.
Dr. Gonzo said:<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8BV0_mrXnqc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Dr. Gonzo said:<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8BV0_mrXnqc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Finn said:The URL says one thing, but the actual page title says another. Looks like they fell for it first but then corrected their error.