Darth Vile
New member
The big clue is in the new soundtrack (last track Finale), as the Raiders March transitions into Mutt's...
Lucas, looking dandy with slicked-back gray and white hair in a snappy tuxedo, was a guest Thursday night at Paramount/DreamWorks's party for "Kung Fu Panda" at the 61st Cannes Film Festival...
"I haven't even told Steven or Harrison this," he said. "But I have an idea to make Shia [LeBeouf] the lead character next time and have Harrison [Ford] come back like Sean Connery did in the last movie. I can see it working out.
"And it's not like Harrison is even old. I mean, he's 65 and he did everything in this movie. The old chemistry is there, and it's not like he's an old man. He's incredibly agile; he looks even better than he did 20 years ago, if you ask me." ...
torao said:You know...
ARGH! Frack ...me.
You can quote me on that, CNN and NY Times.
SKAbatula said:...to "How soon BEFORE Indy 4 will Indy 5 rumours start?" ?
Jonah could have easily been swallowed by a whale. Baleen whales have no teeth and take in hundred of fish at a time. If he was fishing, he could have been swept through their baleen and kept alive in it's mouth.Jndy said:Only fundamentalists interpret the Old Testament literally. Most Christians don't think Jonah was literally swallowed by a whale, or that Noah put one of every species on a boat, or that all of mankind descends from two people named Adam and Eve.
Didn't TOD transition from Raiders to Shortie?Darth Vile said:The big clue is in the new soundtrack (last track Finale), as the Raiders March transitions into Mutt's...
WillKill4Food said:Jonah could have easily been swallowed by a whale. Baleen whales have no teeth and take in hundred of fish at a time. If he was fishing, he could have been swept through their baleen and kept alive in it's mouth.
Noah could have just put a set of young animals of each genera on a boat easily. Most species are just offshoots of a simple animal that have changed over time (that's called evolution, by the way and every scientist worth his salt believes in it).
In the early nineties, scientists were saying that all of humanity was spawned from a single African woman and her husband; they believed that they were the first homo sapiens. So, again, what's hard to believe?
But, in fact, those aren't even Biblical errors, just clergical errors.Jndy said:There's a lot of stuff in there that just isn't scientifically accurate - from a geocentric universe to a flat Earth to sea monsters that guard the edge of the Earth.
I know, and I know what you mean. Again, the Tree of Life is most likely metaphorical, but I don't think Jonah or Noah's Ark are, at least not entirely. I was just saying that most of those who follow a faith stemming from Abraham generally interpret the Bible literally. Not so much in Western America, but in Eastern America, the Middle East, Central America, converted areas of Asia, and rural Europe literal interpretations are the most common.Jndy said:Considering other (e.g. non-literal) readings of the Bible will probably not weaken your faith; it's greatly strengthened mine and that of others.
(I just checked online- biblical literalism is mainstream in Tennessee. So I retract my "not mainstream" comment. It isn't common in California, so my answer was a bit geographically biased.)
Looks like you got that wrong @fedoraboy.I'm seeing May 22nd 2008 as the final destination in a decade long journey to get Indy back on the big screen, but perhaps,instead, it will be the start of the Indy 5 journey?
I'm fairly certain Indy 5 will never happen, at least not with Ford attached, but once Indy 4 has been and gone, and we've all seen it on the big screen a dozen times and reflected on how good/bad it was, will our hope, our obsessive hope, turn to waiting for an Indy 5, will Lucas and Spielberg tempt us with throwaway comments about there being just one more adventure for Indy?
Personally, I certainly hope not, I've had enough of blind hope, it's payed off this time but I wouldn't want to go through the decades of development again...
One of the things I'm most curious about is what Indy's personality will be. In KOTCS, they really leaned into the idea that he was turning into his father, with Indy being concerned that "somebody's going to get hurt!" and uttering phrases like "Intolerable!", etc. This was a far cry from the personality he had in the previous films, where he was usually the one coming up with the crazy ideas.Anytime I see this image of ford, I get excited. He’s old, but so what. He looks good! I wanna see what a post crystal skull Indy movie looks like. Will it feel like a spiritual successor, feeling more in line with the original three? Who knows, I’m excited
Indy was pretty reckless in Crystal Skull too though.One of the things I'm most curious about is what Indy's personality will be. In KOTCS, they really leaned into the idea that he was turning into his father, with Indy being concerned that "somebody's going to get hurt!" and uttering phrases like "Intolerable!", etc. This was a far cry from the personality he had in the previous films, where he was usually the one coming up with the crazy ideas.
While it kind of made sense to give him that personality in KOTCS, I would rather see more of the reckless Indy that made the previous films so entertaining. But I'm not sure how they could do that without just ignoring KOTCS. I suppose they could explain that family life was starting to get boring for him, and he's feeling restless and eager to experience some adventure/danger again.
He still had elements of that recklessness, but overall, he seemed much more cautious than he was in the previous films. He certainly didn't seem like a guy who would cut a rope bridge in half. If that scene took place in KOTCS, Mutt or Marion would attempt to cut the bridge in half, and Indy would be saying, "Bad idea! Somebody's going to get hurt!"Indy was pretty reckless in Crystal Skull too though.
“I’d cover my ears if I were you.”
Well considering the leaks, looks like Indy is back to making the crazy decisions again. AHEM *Glasgow* lolOne of the things I'm most curious about is what Indy's personality will be. In KOTCS, they really leaned into the idea that he was turning into his father, with Indy being concerned that "somebody's going to get hurt!" and uttering phrases like "Intolerable!", etc. This was a far cry from the personality he had in the previous films, where he was usually the one coming up with the crazy ideas.
While it kind of made sense to give him that personality in KOTCS, I would rather see more of the reckless Indy that made the previous films so entertaining. But I'm not sure how they could do that without just ignoring KOTCS. I suppose they could explain that family life was starting to get boring for him, and he's feeling restless and eager to experience some adventure/danger again.
Ha - good find digging this up! I suppose everyone is allowed to be wrong once every 15 years!Looks like you got that wrong @fedoraboy.
We are getting years of Indy 5 with Ford attached and unfortunately, we went through at least a decade of development hell.
Its a good thing Ford is relatively young otherwise this might of been an issue!