Lance Quazar said:However, Brad Bird has more than earned the benefit of the doubt.
Sigh.
I guess I'll have to see it after all.
This is where I stand as well.
Lance Quazar said:However, Brad Bird has more than earned the benefit of the doubt.
Sigh.
I guess I'll have to see it after all.
oki9Sedo said:I thought it was very enjoyable, refreshingly light and breezy in an age of dark, gritty Bourne/Bond films (thats not a criticism of those films, which I like alot, its just nice to get a light, fun spy film once in a while).
Where does it rank among the four? Hard to say, while they are all different stylistically, I think they are all of pretty much the same quality.
Henry W Jones said:Except for MI2. Terrible film. Otherwise I agree.
This movie is one of the top 3 GREATEST action films of all-time.Attila the Professor said:Finally got around to seeing this. Brad Bird did one heck of a job, and certainly seems to know his way around a smart action set piece.
Moedred said:Hopefully this is the right place to post about the highly profitable sequel trilogy, which scored 94% and 93% so far and for the first time kept the director for a sequel following the shortest gap yet. Even the villain from 5 is coming back. And Mrs. Ethan Hunt. I don't recall Hunt snogging the last two female leads... could it be he's got a secret family like Hawkeye?
Moedred said:Look what could have been with better insurance.