Face_Melt
Well-known member
Kai Hagen said:An Indiana Jones movie wouldn't be an Indiana Jones movie without Harrison Ford. At least have him appear in a minor role as an old Indiana Jones.
At the VERY least.
Kai Hagen said:An Indiana Jones movie wouldn't be an Indiana Jones movie without Harrison Ford. At least have him appear in a minor role as an old Indiana Jones.
Like The Dude said...Kai Hagen said:An Indiana Jones movie wouldn't be an Indiana Jones movie without Harrison Ford.
Harrison Ford played the leading roles in those films. A different person would've gave a different feeling to the movie. From what I've seen, different people playing the leading roles in the remakes made the movies feel very different. A different Indy in a sequel would become a very different sequel.Z dweller said:Like The Dude said...
Yeah, I'm aware of that.Kai Hagen said:Harrison Ford played the leading roles in those films.
If we get an Indy 6, it'll be a prequel. And with the right script/actor/director it could be great.A different Indy in a sequel would become a very different sequel.
It's not just an opinion. It's what I noticed with a lot of the sequels that had different actors on the same role.Z dweller said:Yeah, I'm aware of that.
If we get an Indy 6, it'll be a prequel. And with the right script/actor/director it could be great.
Different, but great all the same.
Ford was born in 1942, you do the math.Kai Hagen said:How do you know that it would be a prequel?
Z dweller said:Ford was born in 1942, you do the math.
I really don't think Disney would do that. What would be their target audience?Raiders112390 said:I think he means, how do we know it'd be a prequel rather than a total reboot of the franchise ala Star Trek, replacing or subtly remaking the original films rather than complementing them?
Z dweller said:I really don't think Disney would do that. What would be their target audience?
You seem to be in a betting mood today, would you care to make a little wager, just for fun?
You're moving the goalposts.Raiders112390 said:Okay. 50 bucks says Indy 6 is a soft reboot which, essentially, undoes or undercuts the original saga.
Z dweller said:You're moving the goalposts.
In your previous posts you mentioned a total reboot, now talk about a soft reboot.
That's a subjective term, which different people would interpret in different ways.
Would you say that TFA was a soft reboot of A new hope?
Then we are in agreement.Raiders112390 said:I don't think Disney would consider a total reboot (like, changing the time period, gender, etc of Indy), but I do think they will do a Trek style soft reboot. Which ignores the original films or rewrites them but doesn't necessarily replace them.
Z dweller said:Then we are in agreement.
I always said Disney were going to go straight back to the roots of the franchise, just like they did with TFA.
And if done tastefully, that could work very well IMO. We shall see...
An overwhelming majority of viewers and critics disagrees with you.Raiders112390 said:TFA didn't feel like a SW film to me. It felt like a modern day Sci-Fi film with SW elements kind of grafted onto it.
That is a laughable statement.They don't understand the films or the feel or the influences which made them what they are.
That makes two of us.And frankly I also don't want to see an SJW Indy movie, either.
Z dweller said:An overwhelming majority of viewers and critics disagrees with you.
I suspect you are letting your own fond memories of better times and emotions past limit your ability to form an objective view.
That is a laughable statement.
You can argue that Disney are all about the $$$, like most for profit organizations, but they certainly know their business inside out and do not lack that type of judgement.
That makes two of us.
Lao_Che said:And what exactly is an "SJW Indy movie"?
IndyBuff said:Indy will be transgender with a supporting cast of all women, including several gay characters. The villains will all be white men who are destroying the environment. Did I leave anything out?