Disney has already made Star Wars without George Lucas - and got pretty much nothing but universal acclaim for it.RicMadDogBuxton said:Anyway pointless Steven as already said he couldn't imagine anyone else playing him...and I think he as a big say in that matter.
Finn said:It's not so hard to imagine them making Indiana Jones without Spielberg.
Major West said:Nah, it was the script and story. The direction was as good as any of the previous sequels.
Udvarnoky said:Mutt shouldn't appear. Indy can acknowledge that his family's doing fine to somebody while on his (hopefully exclusively overseas) fifth adventure, but that'll do it for me.
I always assumed Mutt was In his 20's I could be wrong but I don't think there is much of an age gap between Pratt and Shia? but I could see Pratt being an Indy sidekick or protégé ...Aaron H said:I wonder, if Disney will cast Pratt as a "grown-up" Mutt...that might be too much of a stretch, but I could see it happening.
DARTH ZOIDBERG said:I always assumed Mutt was In his 20's I could be wrong but I don't think there is much of an age gap between Pratt and Shia? but I could see Pratt being an Indy sidekick or protégé ...
I don't think we can point the finger at any one thing for Kingdom's problems. Yes, the story was partly to blame, the script, maybe, but it wasn't just them. It was lots of little things that made a big impact.Major West said:Nah, it was the script and story. The direction was as good as any of the previous sequels.
I wasn't directing that towards your post at all, if that's what you were thinking, I think your concept art looks fantastic!Indy1Jones2 said:Well Harrison is my favorite actor so I thought I give Pratt a try.