Gear said:
Am I the only one who doesn't get this?
kongisking said:
I don't get it either, honestly. I'm assuming its some Monty Python-level complex wit at play that I'm just not grasping.
Guys, if a joke has to be laid out then it wasn't delivered very well so here's the deal:
It's a 3-pronged poke at the following statement:
"FRANCHISES (the accepted term for people without a large, uncomfortable stick up their butt)".
Poke #1) If 'franchises' is "the accepted term for" people without sticks up their butts, then it's OK to call those people, FRANCHISES.
* (Notice how the 2 characters WITH sticks up their butts are talking about the others without.)
*For example:
UNEMPLOYED (the accepted term for people without a job)
SOCIOPATHS (the accepted term for people without a conscience)
FRANCHISES (the accepted term for people without a large, uncomfortable stick up their butt)
etc.
Poke #2) If people WITHOUT sticks up their butts consider it acceptable to use a word incorrectly, then the 2 guys represent the likely appearance of those people. (Notice how they don't have sticks in their bums.)
Poke #3) If some people are smart enough, they will realize the 3rd poke without any explanation.
-----
BACK TO INDY 5:
If anyone has a stick up their derrière, it's people who make a BIG NOISE for a 5th movie. (That's not a stick, though, it's an enormous SHAFT!
)