DeepSixFix
New member
Perhaps, but probably with more wisecracks, explosions and gunfire.Face_Palm said:Sounds like the plot of Mr. Holmes (2015).
Perhaps, but probably with more wisecracks, explosions and gunfire.Face_Palm said:Sounds like the plot of Mr. Holmes (2015).
Z dweller said:What would be the point of digitally rejuvenating Ford, when Disney are planning future prequels anyway?
Much better to take the opportunity offered by the last full "canon" movie to introduce a younger actor in his late 20s to early 30s, paving the way for his return in the prequels.
In which year, though? (This thread is not about where, it's about when.)Kai Hagen said:http://history-world.org/archeology.htm
In one of the scenes, I'd like to see Indy exploring underneath one of those cities.
Ha ha! Nice try, Lao Wilhelm! Only the transitions ("morphing") of Donovan's decay were done digitally.Wilhelm said:They digitally aged Donovan in Last Crusade (1989).
This is what the man said.Face_Palm said:Nobody knows what Disney is planning outside of pure internet speculation.
Z dweller said:This is what the man said.
“Not like Star Wars, but we hope… right now, we’re focused on a reboot, or a continuum and then a reboot of some sort.”
“Well, we’ll bring him back, then we have to figure out what comes next. That’s what I mean. It’s not really a reboot, it’s a boot — a reboot. I don’t know. We [got] Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones in the film. But then what’s the direction? I’ve had discussions about what the direction is, [but] I don’t want to get into it. I don’t think it reaches the scale of the universe of Star Wars, but I see making more. It won’t be just a one-off.”
Do you think that Disney bought the IP just to make one last movie with Ford? Seriously?
Of course. Absolutely. Conversations about a young, Computer Generated Harry Ford? There are plenty of other places to pontificate such preposterous platitudes.Udvarnoky said:I think the larger point is that of context. Donovan's death was supernatural and therefore the natural province of special effects. I would consider a digitally de-aged Ford a very different matter...
How else do you interpret "...making more. It won?t be just a one-off" ?Face_Palm said:Again, the world "prequel" isn't in there anywhere. The Indy stories they could tell could be in any time period. You're making a lot of assumptions. Disney has never said prequel.
“I don’t think anyone could replace Harrison as Indy, I don’t think that’s ever going to happen. It’s certainly not my intention to ever have another actor step into his shoes in the way there have been many actors that have played Spider-Man or Batman. There is only going to be one actor playing Indiana Jones and that’s Harrison Ford.”
Precisely.Udvarnoky said:Even if he does step down when they say, Iger has already alluded to Indy's future, so it's obviously being discussed. It's not like Disney's waiting for Indy 5 to get released to start plotting the next stages. He's already involved with future Indy films in that sense.
Except that other actors have already played Indiana Jones besides Ford, so...Face_Palm said:Spielberg, during an interview with Screen Daily that focuses heavily on his new critically-acclaimed Cold War drama Bridge of Spies, had the following to say regarding the prospect of Ford being recast as Dr. Jones:
DeepSixFix said:Except that other actors have already played Indiana Jones besides Ford, so...