TheRaider.net
 

Go Back   The Raven > Off Topic > Films
User Name
Password

View Poll Results: The 3D Fad
Love it! 1 5.26%
Over it 15 78.95%
I'm somewhere in the middle 1 5.26%
3D? is that a bra size??? 2 10.53%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2010, 06:31 PM   #1
00Kevin
Indyfan
 
00Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: California
Posts: 2,009
The Official "I'm totally over this whole 3D fad; Totally!" Thread

3d was cool whenever you went to disneyland and saw some 15 minute short that was intended to be shown in 3d, thus the effects have been the main priority of the production team and are often pretty good. but for an entire feature it just seems overdone and is becoming more of a distraction than anything. sure, it was kinda cool at first, but after a few minutes of it i feel like i've had it. Some movies (ie clash of the titans) are just throwing 3d on at the last second for the sake of saying that they have a 3d version, and the 3d isn't really all that impressive anyways.

the bottom line: I'm going to the theater for a movie experience, not a 3D experience. Thoughts?





PS: does anyone else think that this little guy is dodging the bullet:

- - - - -

?
00Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 06:43 PM   #2
Pale Horse
Moderator
 
Pale Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 6,988
Like a bra size, more then a mouthfull is too much.
Pale Horse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 07:01 PM   #3
ResidentAlien
Guest
 
ResidentAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,303
Never was into it. It was a stupid gimmick when it was around briefly in the 50s, again in the 80s-- I don't know what they expect to be different this time around. Every 30 years they do this stupid experiment when they're hurting for money and want to reinvigorate ticket sales. Every 30 years it hits hard at first and dies quickly.
ResidentAlien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 08:17 PM   #4
IAdventurer01
IndyFan
 
IAdventurer01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wish I knew....
Posts: 1,045
To be fair, I have yet to see some these 3D films (outside of amusement parks.)
However, I just don't understand the point. In terms of clarity and even general depth of field, a well filmed, HD piece can seem to be naturally 3D. When the 3D effect is forced, I feel that it makes the whole image less natural, therefore less lifelike and a step backwards visually for the industry.

Not to mention that the 3D effect does not work for everyone. I forget the statistic, but a fairly large portion of the population cannot process these effects, so mass shift to 3D would be hell for these people.
IAdventurer01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 09:56 PM   #5
YouNeverKnow
IndyFan
 
YouNeverKnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by 00Kevin

PS: does anyone else think that this little guy is dodging the bullet:

- - - - -

?

Every so often he does dodge the bullet. But I'd say closer to 2/3 times he's toast.
YouNeverKnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 09:59 PM   #6
TheMutt92
IndyFan
 
TheMutt92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,440
The poll choices aren't as clear and specific as my opinion, so I just put in the middle. Allow me to explain...

3D is a tool, just like CGI or sound. When used properly it can enhance the movie experience such as in Avatar or Up. But the real problem behind the 3D 'fad' is that studios see it as a surefire way to gain an extra three or four bucks for every ticket sold, hence we have all these 3D conversions, which isn't true 3D (Clash of the Titans).

So as long as 3D is used properly (not gimmicky 'in-your-face'), I'm all for it. But as long as studios as simply cranking out these conversions, I'll sit and wait at home until I hear the film is being shown traditionally.
TheMutt92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 10:09 PM   #7
TheMutt92
IndyFan
 
TheMutt92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,440
An interesting point...

http://www.cinematical.com/2010/04/0...he-distinctio/
TheMutt92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 11:54 PM   #8
Violet
Moderator Emeritus
 
Violet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Host City of the 2018 Commonwealth Games, Australia
Posts: 3,196
Over it.

Same reasons as RA, would also like to add that they use 3D as a excuse to jack up BO ticket prices (It's 20 bucks for one adult for a 3D movie, which equals to one standard adult movie ticket plus a third more in Australia anyway).

Personally, I believe if filmmakers want to use 3D, they should dump digital movements (such as spins) in camera shots, as those movements often make people sick and dizzy and can be quite a health hazard to a few people. Movies should be accessible to everyone, not just to those blessed with an iron stomach. You can have your digital movements without the 3D. It's also otherwise too busy visually; and I personally haven't been comfortable with the thought of viewing a few of these 3D releases, (such as Avatar and even Alice in Wonderland) for that reason.

I saw Avatar in 2D, at the drive in by the way (It was the B reel). It really would have to be something special in 3D, because I actually fell alseep watching it!

I enjoy 3D when it's short and sweet, at a theme park, along with the "4D" effects as much as anyone. But when I go to the movies, sure there's a desire to see a visual spectacle with certain genres, but above all, a compelling, well-played out story. Give me my money's worth without the busy visual headaches and spinning nausea, thank you!!!
Violet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 12:26 AM   #9
indy34
IndyFan
 
indy34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 771
Totally over it
I was going to see a movie on Saturday but all the movies I wanted to see were in 3D and weren't being offered in 2D, so I thought I'd keep my $20.
indy34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 01:05 AM   #10
Lance Quazar
IndyFan
 
Lance Quazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lost
Posts: 1,887
Aside from IMAX documentaries, I never want to see another F-ing 3D movie again.

Ugh.

I will never go to another narrative 3d film.

It's awful, it is LESS immersive than 2d. I am always reminded that I'm watching a movie. It's distracting, pointless, adds nothing to the process. It makes the movie look further away, more removed, smaller in scope, etc.

Hate it.
Lance Quazar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 02:11 AM   #11
Montana Smith
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,616
When the Eagle comic returned in the early 1980s there was a 3D strip made up of green and red ink, which you had to use the classic green and red lensed glasses to view. As a kid I was fascinated for a short while, but it was a pain to read. When my dad saw it he told me he'd seen The House of Wax in 3D back in the '50s, and that he even thought it was a silly gimmick back then.

Before the Eagle comic there was the Viewmaster with it's 3D photo images on card discs. They had the effect of layering images on top of each other, almost like scenery in a Victorian child's card theatre. In The Clash of the Titans thread Moedred quoted an article which described the 3D effects, which sounded similar to the effects created by the Viewmaster.

Based on all those experiences, I can say that I'm not fussed about 3D, and think that it will serve as a gimmick, at the expense of the film itself. If a film is good enough in the traditional elements of photography and storytelling, then I'll be immersed in it anyway, without the need of 3D technology.

Until we get full holographic film I'm not interested!
Montana Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 02:26 AM   #12
Indy's brother
IndyFan
 
Indy's brother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: In the Map Room playing with a laser pointer
Posts: 3,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montana Smith
Until we get full holographic film I'm not interested!

Here, here. Until Indy is actually cracking his whip in my living room while I duck and protect my beer from it, I really don't need it.
Indy's brother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 09:30 PM   #13
indy34
IndyFan
 
indy34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Quazar
Aside from IMAX documentaries, I never want to see another F-ing 3D movie again.
Completely agree IMAX documentaries are pretty good in 3D I still remember one about the moon it was fantastic but yes aside from those, 3D is just a gimmick.

On another note did you hear they're bringing out 3D TV...
indy34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 09:59 PM   #14
JP Jones
IndyFan
 
JP Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Space between Spaces
Posts: 638
I saw Avatar in 3-D and that was it. Seeing it I really thought it was really cool and totally enhanced the experience. However, seeing the previews was awful. I saw a preview for "Despicable Me" and I felt like I was on the Tilt-A-Whirl. The movement can give one a horribly dizzing feeling. I can't contemplate sitting through a hour and a half of that. Heck, in Avatar I had to remove my glasses sometimes. I'm not saying 3-D is always going to look horrible, but I think with animation it doesn't look very good.

The main reason that I'm not really sold on 3-D is the price tag. Avatar was the exception to my rule to not go to a movie over 20 bucks because I had to see what 3-D was like and what better place than Avatar, but for any other movie I just don't want to pay so much for 3-D. It doesn't really do much to the movie other than give you some minor thrills and a upset stomach.

Like some others said, 3-D is great when your seeing a short show in an amusement park (I'm so excited to see Amazing Spider-man in IoA), but the film thing is getting tiring. I wish we could convince Hollywood that 3-D isn't so cool.
JP Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2010, 10:19 PM   #15
Goonie
IndyFan
 
Goonie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 2,069
Don't know about how long 3D will last. What we really need is virtual reality goggles so we can watch some psychedelic Wookie porn:




On second thought... no.
Goonie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 01:27 AM   #16
Montana Smith
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie
Don't know about how long 3D will last. What we really need is virtual reality goggles so we can watch some psychedelic Wookie porn:


On second thought... no.


What the....?

All we need now is William Shatner reading his poetry to music in 3D, then we can call this 3d experiment complete!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy's brother
Here, here. Until Indy is actually cracking his whip in my living room while I duck and protect my beer from it, I really don't need it.



Some kinky devils won't even be ducking, but lining themselves up...

Last edited by Montana Smith : 04-17-2010 at 01:32 AM.
Montana Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 03:34 AM   #17
Goonie
IndyFan
 
Goonie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 2,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montana Smith
What the....?
What's this? An individual who hasn't seen The Star Wars Holiday Special? Oh boy, virgin blood.

Speaking of Star Wars...you know how they are converting Star Tours in Disneyland to 3D? Well it's actually going to be 4D! Ya. That stuff splashing on your face will be real vomit... from me.
Goonie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 03:40 AM   #18
Montana Smith
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie
What's this? An individual who hasn't seen The Star Wars Holiday Special? Oh boy, virgin blood.

Never seen it. It makes The Phantom Menace look respectable!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goonie
Speaking of Star Wars...you know how they are converting Star Tours in Disneyland to 3D? Well it's actually going to be 4D! Ya. That stuff splashing on your face will be real vomit... from me.

As Cleveland would say, "That's...just...naaaasty."
Montana Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 09:21 AM   #19
Agent Crab
IndyFan
 
Agent Crab's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Creepy Gopher Hole
Posts: 1,256
I am really tired of half these movies in 3D. I really don't like watching a movie in 3D, due to I twitch and fidget alot. That I also have motion sickness.

A Movie that is in 3D is around $7.00 at the Rave threater here.
Agent Crab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 12:41 PM   #20
Montana Smith
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent Crab
I am really tired of half these movies in 3D. I really don't like watching a movie in 3D, due to I twitch and fidget alot. That I also have motion sickness.

A Movie that is in 3D is around $7.00 at the Rave threater here.

I get nauseous if I try to read something in a moving car (as a passenger that is, not whilst driving). So I'd probably get queasy watching a 3D film.

3D just ain't natural. Films is flat, just like the earth. No good will ever come of it!

Humbug.
Montana Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 06:15 PM   #21
Nurhachi1991
IndyFan
 
Nurhachi1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pankot Palace
Posts: 4,771
3D would be great if it werent just bloody kids movies that utilize the technology.


I saw my bloody valentine in 3D and had a blast. Hollywood need to make more R rated 3D flicks.





Also does anyone else think that Real D isnt as good as Red/Blue glasses? I do
Nurhachi1991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.