ClintonHammond
Guest
"Prove it didn't exist."
That's not how it works... It is up to the person making the claim to provide proof of the occurrence. Show proof there was a global flood... Show proof that hasn't already been refuted over and over and over. Ron Wyatt was unable to do it.... I'm not holding my breath that anyone else ever will either.
"Disprove the Bible."
This planet was NEVER covered by water.... This planet is WAY more than 5+ thousand years old.... (acknowledging the fact that I haven't seen the docu. this thread is originally about) There is NO evidence to support the assertion that there were ever Jewish 'slaves' in Egypt.... It is biologically IMPOSSIBLE for 2 or 4 members of a species to populate (or even repopulate) the planet.... NO boat could carry 2 of every creature on this ball of rock....
"Anytime anything that could possibly be construed as Biblical evidence is produced, be sure character assassination is right behind it."
I think you're over-reacting, inferring slights were none exist, just because you WANT it to be 'true' and the sceptics/scientists/experts demonstrate over and over again that it isn't....
That's not how it works... It is up to the person making the claim to provide proof of the occurrence. Show proof there was a global flood... Show proof that hasn't already been refuted over and over and over. Ron Wyatt was unable to do it.... I'm not holding my breath that anyone else ever will either.
"Disprove the Bible."
This planet was NEVER covered by water.... This planet is WAY more than 5+ thousand years old.... (acknowledging the fact that I haven't seen the docu. this thread is originally about) There is NO evidence to support the assertion that there were ever Jewish 'slaves' in Egypt.... It is biologically IMPOSSIBLE for 2 or 4 members of a species to populate (or even repopulate) the planet.... NO boat could carry 2 of every creature on this ball of rock....
"Anytime anything that could possibly be construed as Biblical evidence is produced, be sure character assassination is right behind it."
I think you're over-reacting, inferring slights were none exist, just because you WANT it to be 'true' and the sceptics/scientists/experts demonstrate over and over again that it isn't....