Katarn07
New member
Would it really have mattered had ToD taken place between RotLA and LC? I for one don't think it would have. Change a few things here and there and I think it'd be just as good as a sequel.
In RotLA, Indy tells Marcus he doesn't believe in magic and superstition as he's packing his things at his house yet he was an eye witness to an actual Thuggee Cult. That's one minor problem with the timeline of the movies I've noticed.
The only reason it was a prequel and not a sequel I think was because they didn't want Indy to have dumped Marion or anything. What do you think about this? Would ToD be better or worse as a sequel rather than a prequel? Or would it pretty much have been the same?
In RotLA, Indy tells Marcus he doesn't believe in magic and superstition as he's packing his things at his house yet he was an eye witness to an actual Thuggee Cult. That's one minor problem with the timeline of the movies I've noticed.
The only reason it was a prequel and not a sequel I think was because they didn't want Indy to have dumped Marion or anything. What do you think about this? Would ToD be better or worse as a sequel rather than a prequel? Or would it pretty much have been the same?