Pale Horse said:
Are we citing directors of movies we like, or are we citing a directors talent. Does anyone really know what's involved in directing, or do we just see something we like, and assume it must be good because of "him/her"...
Good point. It's the only reason Gore Verbinski or Michael Bay could have been mentioned so far.
No, safe to say most people on this board haven't a clue what goes into creating a film.
I do subscribe to Auteur theory, though. I certainly credit individual contribution, but I subscribe to the view of a director as say... Captain of the ship. The one who unifies the vision.
Werner Herzog is, while perhaps not truly my favorite, nearly without contest the most dedicated and unique of directors. His dedication and oft-maniacal dedication make him a clear leader in his field. What other director would have hatched (simultaneously with his intended victim) a plan to kill his star and best friend (Klaus Kinski) who in turn planned to kill his director? It's utterly absurdist and fascinating. And of course there's the various heroic (or flat-out stupid) things Herzog has done in the name of his art. Jumped onto a cactus to motivate his crew? Created a film where they literally raised a boat over a mountain? Saved Joaquin Phoenix's life? Eaten his leather boot to reward his friend for completing his first film? How about getting shot in the stomach during an interview and continuing the interview? Herzog is a mad-genius; a true Auteur. For that reason, he stands above the rest.
And by no means are his films my favorite, mind you.
Kubrick, Bergman, Antonioni round off the list for me, I think.
Wilder too. And Kurosawa.