JerryKing said:
By the way, to actually venture into dumb "what if this and that happened instead of the relevant part of the fictitious screenplay draft" speculations - Ravenwood would probably have no case at all if his daughter was, in fact, 15, as they were away on an excavation somewhere, and that is the age of consent in most countries.
Anyway, how about ending this thread; that exchange between L & S was fun to toss around for a while in the "conference" thread below, but does this sort of nonsense really require its own dedicated threads?
Well, if the responses aren't enough, apparently there ARE people who this is new to.
What is your motivation to control a conversation you're not interested in? You found what was interesting to you, just move on.
Why don't you want someone else to engage in some sort of discourse to express themselves and discover some truth for themselves.
For someone like me, I hold the same point of view as the cinematic characters...it was wrong, regardless of law, region or decade.
What I do find interesting is how each of the posters approach the subject, some people believe in this day and age it's not a big deal, some people point out Jerry Lee Lewis, (she was also his cousin, no?).
It's not the most attractive aspect of the character, and the authors, but it has undeniably struck a chord...and I enjoy the unpredictable directions the conversation is taking us. Like it or not this is your HERO Indiana Jones.
It's an excellent way to reveal character...I appreciate your question and the answer is: YES unless you want it to gum up the developing conversation on the BIG BANG thread.
Great name...how prophetic!