ResidentAlien said:http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4317&Itemid=99
There's the bootleg.
Damn ugly little monstrosity. And I don't meant that in the recording quality. It's relatively clear. I mean it in that that trailer is awful.
ResidentAlien said:http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4317&Itemid=99
There's the bootleg.
Damn ugly little monstrosity. And I don't meant that in the recording quality. It's relatively clear. I mean it in that that trailer is awful.
JD2008 said:It looks like this time they are relying a bit too much on cgi. No doubt because of Indy's age, but the real reason to use cgi is to keep the interests of all the younger moviegoers.
I loved the music in the beginning.
Avilos said:The people who are complaining about this trailer should not see the movie at all. I am deadly serious. Because you are impossible to please. But you will never admit that.
Avilos said:The people who are complaining about this trailer should not see the movie at all. I am deadly serious. Because you are impossible to please. But you will never admit that.
Avilos said:The people who are complaining about this trailer should not see the movie at all. I am deadly serious. Because you are impossible to please. But you will never admit that.
ResidentAlien said:Of course we won't admit that. Because that's an idiotic, presumptuous and flatly wrong statement.
triklops said:It's guys like you I will never understand.... Nobody has to like everything because it has written "Spielber/Lucas/Ford" over it....
It's people like you that partly "made" the Star Wars prequels look like they do because people accept everything.
Lucas may sh*t on a big screen, write "Star Wars" or "Indy" (Not saying the trailer is sh*t) all over it and some people would still love it...
Avilos said:Your the King of presumptuous and flatly wrong statements. You have such a narrow definition of what Indiana Jones is supposed to be that this film was never going to make you happy. I have followed your posts. I know what I am talking about!
triklops said:It's guys like you I will never understand.... Nobody has to like everything because it has written "Spielber/Lucas/Ford" over it....
It's people like you that partly "made" the Star Wars prequels look like they do because people accept everything.
Lucas may sh*t on a big screen, write "Star Wars" or "Indy" (Not saying the trailer is sh*t) all over it and some people would still love it...
Avilos said:I am not a person like that at all. IS JUST A TRAILER nothing more. There is not much to really judge the film on. That is my point. There are people just like you describe. I don't like those people either. There are also are also people who are the opposite of that....
ResidentAlien said:What the hell do you mean?! You just saw 2 minutes of footage straight out of the film. You now know the cinematographic style and the relative tone of the film. That's plenty to begin judgment on.
Stop being such a follower. Question once in awhile.
Salacious said:Well, I am not sure if I agree with that. The trailers for Phantom Menace were awesome, but that didnt make the movie the next best thing since sliced bread did it? - albeit, its not as bad a film many make it out to be.
I dont think you can judge anything in the movie from the trailers 100%. Certain elements like usage of CGI and stuff like that...yeah, maybe you can say a trailer gives that away, but the editing, tone, direction, etc etc you really cant just simply judge from the trailer.
ResidentAlien said:What the hell do you mean?! You just saw 2 minutes of footage straight out of the film. You now know the cinematographic style and the relative tone of the film. That's plenty to begin judgment on.
Stop being such a follower. Question once in awhile.