Nurhachi1991
Well-known member
Still playing uncharted beat Arkham city the lack of Robin was lame...
Now Im playing that new Call of Booty
Now Im playing that new Call of Booty
This comment was so loaded with self-evidentness (at least from a certain point of view) that I'm kinda having hard time telling whether you actually meant this as a serious post or are merely chaffing with me.Henry W Jones said:I finished Infamous a week ago and loved it. Just started part 2 and it is far better than the first. Both games are sandbox games and I love the fact you can choose between good and evil. In part two the give you more powers than the first game and it also has a lot more levels. It also looks and plays like part one except the graphics are sharper and the character seems to have a bit more control. Both games are lots of fun.
Likewise, though after doing a bit more research I'm willing to wait it out.Le Saboteur said:I haven't obsessively played an Elder Scrolls release since Daggerfall. And haven't really enjoyed one since Redguard, but I couldn't pass on the combination of Norse mythology and the return of dragons to Tamriel!
Finn said:Likewise, though after doing a bit nire research I'm willing to wait it out.
Judging after what I've read (yeah, I know, shouldn't really say for sure 'til you've played it), Skyrim appears to be not much different from those other Bethesda titles since Oblivion. As release version vanilla they're not unplayable by any means, but could use some extra polish. The content is just so plentiful that it's simply impossible for the devs to push out a product without some graphics glitches here and there, some secquence-breaking bugs and other odd scripting issues. Also, it seems that the intuitiviness of the UI is pretty deep in the YMMV territory.
Give it a few months and the devs and the modding community equally should have squashed most of these down and the game is truly worth the high scores it's already getting. I recently made a brief revisit to New Vegas with all the DLCs, patches and a plethora of fan-made fixes installed and while I enjoyed the Mojave when I crashed it for the first time a year ago, it was now - if possible - even more enjoyable.
<small>Of course, if you're a dirty, non-educated console peasant and not one of the glorious PC playing master race, I suppose it's not going to make that much of a difference whether you're waiting or just diving in now.</small>
and:Rocket Surgeon said:Modern Warfare 3
Finn said:...just mentioning the title of the game you're playing isn't going to cut it.
This is exactly why they have conjured up term "first impressions". Simply stating "haven't got far but the opening looks mighty cool" or something similar would still have been a little twitterish, but enough to keep it out of Facebook status territory.Rocket Surgeon said:My apologies.
However the game was released that day and I had just played a bit of it. Hardly enough for a review or opinion. I was excited enough to post, (haven't picked up a game on the first day in a while). Then the power went out again...
I wholeheartedly agree with this... sadly. I have a buddy who picked it up for the X360 and we finished the story mode in two nights and two sittings. While we both certainly figured it was the best paced and most varied campaign over the MW trilogy (made evident that even when not holding the controller, it proved to be pretty neat entertainment, like watching a solid action movie), it was far too brief for its price tag. Sure, its got the Spec Ops mode and good multiplayer to add further meat, but didn't feel like quite up there with its most evident competitor, Battlefield 3.Rocket Surgeon said:The single player campaign, while not really "open" is so varied and cinematic I have to think it's not long before we see Hollywood pick it up.
Lets call it a homage to my favorite moat swimmer:Finn said:This is exactly why they have conjured up term "first impressions". Simply stating "haven't got far but the opening looks mighty cool" or something similar would still have been a little twitterish, but enough to keep it out of Facebook status territory.
DiscoLad said:Battlefield III.... Tomorrow.
Finn said:I wholeheartedly agree with this... sadly. I have a buddy who picked it up for the X360 and we finished the story mode in two nights and two sittings. While we both certainly figured it was the best paced and most varied campaign over the MW trilogy (made evident that even when not holding the controller, it proved to be pretty neat entertainment, like watching a solid action movie), it was far too brief for its price tag. Sure, its got the Spec Ops mode and good multiplayer to add further meat, but didn't feel like quite up there with its most evident competitor, Battlefield 3.
So it's a bit of a miss in my book. The campaign is good and a solid experience, but most of us would be crying foul if we went to the movies on two consecutive nights and the tickets cost $/?25 apiece. And if you're in it for the multi, you're apparently better off picking up that other game.
Hang on... YOU play Skyrim?DiscoLad said:Skyrim... 0_o Ahh skyrim.
DiscoLad said:Hey Drifter, do you find yourself getting run through and one hit by barbarians with greatswords or is that just me? :]
What are your stats, Drifter? Your race. etc. I'm curious.
Mein Gott in Himmel!DiscoLad said:No I just made one of the longest posts I've ever made for my health...