Forbidden Eye
Well-known member
Here's a question that I've actually been pondering for for quite some time. Thought it would merit a thread.
If you look back at the interviews of the Big 3(Lucas, Spielberg, Ford) Spielberg constantly admits he was the one who was holding Indy 4 from getting made because he had "moved on" while Lucas and Ford were ready to return.
If you also take a look at the bonus features on the KOTCS DVD, Spielberg even jokes around by saying stuff like "I'm just going to retire and let some young new director take over".
When I heard that, I immediately started to think, "Should Spielberg had let a new director take over and he just get a producing credit?"
I know, I know, Spielberg is THE guy who directed all three Indiana Jones movies, and it just wouldn't be an Indy film with some else in the director's chair, but think, if Spielberg had decided to had let another director take over, could we have Indy 4 released sooner(and less complaints and criticisms)?
Thoughts?
If you look back at the interviews of the Big 3(Lucas, Spielberg, Ford) Spielberg constantly admits he was the one who was holding Indy 4 from getting made because he had "moved on" while Lucas and Ford were ready to return.
If you also take a look at the bonus features on the KOTCS DVD, Spielberg even jokes around by saying stuff like "I'm just going to retire and let some young new director take over".
When I heard that, I immediately started to think, "Should Spielberg had let a new director take over and he just get a producing credit?"
I know, I know, Spielberg is THE guy who directed all three Indiana Jones movies, and it just wouldn't be an Indy film with some else in the director's chair, but think, if Spielberg had decided to had let another director take over, could we have Indy 4 released sooner(and less complaints and criticisms)?
Thoughts?