ClintonHammond said:Have you not seen the movie?
The Indy in Temple is different from the Indy in Raiders (And WAY different from the Indy in Last Crusade)
If I thought that George, Steven and Harry did it on purpose I could go on for a long time about the evolution of the Indy character.... But I don't.... I think it was just dumb luck that Indy did as well as he did... even a blind squirrel gets a nut occasionally.
quigonkyle said:A reason for it being a prequel could have been the relationship with Indy and Karen Allen
Grizzlor said:You also have to question why The Last Crusade was set in 1938, 8 years after Raiders was made, but only 2 years in the films? I know that the real life German Otto Rahn who looked for the Grail died in 1939, but the historical realities were still in place by at least 1943, when Italy was seized by Germany and the war in Europe really was getting larger. There was no need to refer to the area as the Republic of Hatay, which lasted 9 months, but simply Turkey.
oki9Sedo said:Why is Temple of Doom a prequel?
ClintonHammond said:even a blind squirrel gets a nut occasionally.
oki9Sedo said:Its got absolutely no connection to Raiders of the Lost Ark in any way whatsoever, so they might as well have just made it a sequel and set it in 1937.
ClintonHammond said:Have you not seen the movie?
The Indy in Temple is different from the Indy in Raiders (And WAY different from the Indy in Last Crusade)
If I thought that George, Steven and Harry did it on purpose I could go on for a long time about the evolution of the Indy character.... But I don't.... I think it was just dumb luck that Indy did as well as he did... even a blind squirrel gets a nut occasionally.
René Belloq said:Because Temple is set in 1935 and Raiders in 1936.