Nurhachi1991
Well-known member
Did anyone else think the mininster at the end of the movie was kinda creepy?
Nurhachi1991 said:Did anyone else think the mininster at the end of the movie was kinda creepy?
Stoo said:I agree with you but "someone" out there didn't think so and the cliff shot was redone with CGI for TV!
Rocket Surgeon said:I have yet to watch the revised adventures, is there any improvement?
Were you able to find evidence of any further changes? Did the erase the stunt chair on the fender of the truck? I understand the name Shielman made it to the new release!
Found the thread! Special Edition Truck Chase?Stoo said:It aired on a U.S station that I didn't get so I've only seen a video of the cliff shot. The touch-up came as a complete surprise to everyone but whether it's an improvement or not is hard to say. What I can tell you is that it's a decent facsimile. (There is a thread dedicated to this but I can't find it anymore!) As for Shliemann/Dietrich. What?!? Where?
Just to let you know, birds can break the windshield of a jet airliner and/or get caught in the engines. It is called a "birdstrike" and is a HAZARD to any plane. Birdstrikes are a common training scenario in flight simulators because they cause DAMAGE and are DANGEROUS! Having a flock o' birds take down a fighter plane is neither unbelievable nor "fake". (It may crash a little too quickly in the film but that's for the wham-bam action pace.) When first seeing Henry Sr. doing his umbrella thing & clucking, I thought he'd gone insane...then after the scene played out, I thought, "Brilliant!"QBComics said:But surviving a nuclear blast in a fridge or falling down three huge waterfalls is right up there with jumping out of a crashing plane with a raft, or having a flock of birds take down a German fighter plane.
Stoo said:Just to let you know, birds can break the windshield of a jet airliner and/or get caught in the engines. It is called a "birdstrike" and is a HAZARD to any plane. Birdstrikes are a common training scenario in flight simulators because they cause DAMAGE and are DANGEROUS! Having a flock o' birds take down a fighter plane is neither unbelievable nor "fake". (It may crash a little too quickly in the film but that's for the wham-bam action pace.) When first seeing Henry Sr. doing his umbrella thing & clucking, I thought he'd gone insane...then after the scene played out, I thought, "Brilliant!"
Darth Vile said:Alternatively, people can/have survived atomic explosions… but I’ve not heard of many surviving by hiding in a fridge.
Darth Vile said:To be fair no one would question the fact that birds are a hazard to aircraft, people can survive atomic explosions…many surviving by hiding in a fridge.
Originally Posted by QBComics
yeah of course they're fake. But surviving a nuclear blast in a fridge or falling down three huge waterfalls is right up there with jumping out of a crashing plane with a raft, or having a flock of birds take down a German fighter plane.
Me neither, your turn! Show meDarth Vile said:I'm not sure how many examples there are of someone, on the ground, being able to take out a strafing Messerschmitt with a flock of seagulls.
Darth Vile said:Alternatively, people can/have survived atomic explosions… but I’ve not heard of many surviving by hiding in a fridge.
Rocket Surgeon said:It seems to me this is another example of how you "reposition" or "rephrase" statements to perpetuate an argument. Much as I've done to your "quote" above.
Rocket Surgeon said:...you want EXAMPLES of birds taking down a fighter plane?!
Matinee Idyll said:Anywho, to return to the original question, Is KotCS too fake? My case:
Prairie Dogs.
Fridges.
Ants.
Monkeys.
Aliens.
I still feel dirty.
Absolutely, but they both rely on the flow of air, (unlike Vile it seems), jam that up and it's overemtiem said:It is though a slightly different matter for a jet to be taken down than a propellor plane.
Darth Vile said:Oh dear. Is that the best you can muster for trolling today? What a sad example you set to those, like you, with only three toes and a zip on their head...
Darth Vile said:To be fair...
Rocket Surgeon said:Absolutely, but they both rely on the flow of air, (unlike Vile it seems), jam that up and it's over
Dodge duck dip dive dodge! Nice response!
Let me translate for those of you who don't understand "out of your ass speak":
blah blah blah blah...ad infinitum.
Funny, when you do talk outof your ass your voice is different but your breath is still the same, which is amazing feat considering this is all written!
You're magical
(Hope you found that better then the "last troll" )
Darth Vile said:I expected a better class of trolling... but you've now become lazy at that too...
Darth Vile said:Seems like you are following Spielberg's lead. What a shame.
Which brings us back to the ambiguous nature of this thread topic. "Fake" = unbelievable/implausible...or "Fake" = dodgy visual effects/stuntsDarth Vile said:To be fair... as with many Indy stunts/escapades, I think it's much more the positioning and execution than it is the possibility.
Well, some do question the idea which is why it was brought up. Not to mention the numbskull who put together the video in this thread: Cine Massacre: The Top 10 Dumbest Indiana Jones Moments. Anyway, you're saying there aren't many examples of someone on the ground taking out planes using birds but then you stated:Darth Vile said:no one would question the fact that birds can be/are a hazard to aircraft. However, I'm not sure how many examples there are of someone, on the ground, being able to take out a strafing Messerschmitt with a flock of seagulls. Alternatively, people can/have survived atomic explosions? but I?ve not heard of many surviving by hiding in a fridge.
...which is a contradiction to your previous stance (and you're preaching to the choir with this).Darth Vile said:Of course, WWII was famed for the allies use of trained birds to defeat the Luftwaffe. A great example being that of The Battle of Britain, where circa 500 German planes were downed by a handful of trained herring-seagulls and curlews... So, as you can see, it is indeed quite simple to utilise birds as a defence against strafing Messerschmitts (I'm assuming Henry Jones Senior undertook training in the RAF)
Of course they are. It's Indiana Jones. Don't get me wrong, Darth. I like the fridge (in all its ridiculousness) but it is not "right up there" with the birds/plane scene. It's at a much higher altitude. If the birds scene is at 10,000 feet, the fridge scene is in the exosphere!Darth Vile said:Seems to me that the vast majority of these scenarios are ridiculous in nature, but fun on the big screen.
Actually, Matinee, there's a better one somewhere. It ends with the fridge door opening and a crispy, burnt skeleton pops out. It's very "well done" (no pun intended). You'd like it.Matinee Idyll said:Yeah, even this is more plausible... alot funner too.
If you're doing Daffy Duck as Robin Hood, don't forget "parry".Rocket Surgeon said:Dodge duck dip dive dodge!
Actually it's Patches O'Houlihan, but I know what you're talking about...that's a good one too!Stoo said:If you're doing Daffy Duck as Robin Hood, don't forget "parry".
Stoo said:Anyway, you're saying there aren't many examples of someone on the ground taking out planes using birds but then you stated:
...which is a contradiction to your previous stance (and you're preaching to the choir with this).
Gotcha. (Nonetheless, sometimes truth can be stranger than fiction. The CRAF had a Suicide Seagull Squadron but Canada was never attacked during WW2 so they were never put to use!)emtiem said:Have another read of it and decide whether you think he was being entirely serious or not
Stoo said:Gotcha. (Nonetheless, sometimes truth can be stranger than fiction. The CRAF had a Suicide Seagull Squadron but Canada was never attacked during WW2 so they were never put to use!)
You know what looks fake in "Skull"? The prop snake (the one Indy is pulling on). Snakes have never been easy to replicate and it wasn't improved upon in Indy IV. It's a fake snake.