A very simple game. Answer either "Yes" or "No" to the question presented in the thread title. No gender restrictions based on your preference.
Only one rule: You're allowed to answer only once for each member. So if you've already crushed the hopes to the current last poster, you'll have to wait 'til a person you haven't judged yet comes and posts.
If you want (or need to circumvent the 10 character restriction), you can elaborate why too. But not in words you wouldn't use to disclose the thing to your dear old grandma.
Location: Neuchâtel, Switzerland (Canadian from Montreal)
Posts: 8,026
No, to all 3 of the above. Each are avid video game players, which means: unwashed bodies, plenty of pimples on the face and playing with Wii-Wiis. Things I wouldn't even touch with a 10 foot pole (and I have one)!
No, because a 10 foot pole would be just too well endowed for my taste. Sometimes, showing your modesty, such as a 10 inch pole, is just right and quite good enough.
Yes, because of the semantic nuance of the word with. That being said, Archaeos and I will head off to some Scandanavian or Brazilian joint, and cheers each other as we are with...some smoking hot babes.
Yes, because of the semantic nuance of the word with. That being said, Archaeos and I will head off to some Scandanavian or Brazilian joint, and cheers each other as we are with...some smoking hot babes.
Yes, there indeed is a loophole to be utilized by the more imaginative. A "yes" via a legitimate ménage à trois definitely exists as an option.
That being said, given how the choice is still presented as very binary, there are no caveats though. Meaning, you can't say "yes, if..."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pale Horse
What a weird game, Finn.
Are you referring to the thread or the human mating habits? Because I find it easy to agree with the latter.
---
What comes to the game itself, hmm... have to say no. I haven't had a chance to ask Mordy what the fraternizing rules are under his tenure.
Yes, same back, Pale Horse, because of the original semantic intelligence, the overall approach-to-engage, and the exceedingly good taste in geographical areas that overlaps 100% with mine.
Location: In the Map Room playing with a laser pointer
Posts: 3,029
I would totally do all of you. Period. It's a dominance thing, and you guys are totally as sexy as you believe yourselves to be. And as for the women, they obviously have more self-respect than the rest of us. Now bend over, whoever is first in line....I've got nothing better to do.....
Would I do it with someone who's got the patience of an overcaffeinated chipmunk on speed, who can't wait for a few bloody hours before bumping a thread? Ew, frick no.
Would I do it with someone who's got the patience of an overcaffeinated chipmunk on speed, who can't wait for a few bloody hours before bumping a thread? Ew, frick no.
To yourself. Which is not only known as bumping, but is also a shunned practice in these parts. So... bad manners and babbles to herself? Add that to the pile of hard nos.
