Lance Quazar said:
DarthVile,
I agree that not everything needs to be wall to wall fighting or shooting to qualify as exciting and entertaining and that suspense and tension can be created without distinctly physical fighting. Venice catacombs, going into the Hovitos temple, the Grail temple, etc.
So, yes, the cemetery in KOTCS follows that tradition. Only it doesn't do it particularly well. It's not awful, it's one of the film's better sequences, but it could have been MUCH better.
So I think you are talking more quality than quantity there... which is something else altogether. And as already stated, yes, I'd agree that the Jungle chase in KOTCS (for example), isn't as good as the tank chase in TLC or the truck chase in
Raiders... but for me the Jungle chase/Ants sequence is better than the equivalent sections in TOD. Alternatively, I much prefer the cemetery/Orellana's tomb scenes to any of the Venice action scenes (TLC). So ultimately for me… some bits are better, some bits are the same, and some are inferior.
Lance Quazar said:
I definitely think that Doomtown is part of the opening prologue, which is one large sequence. It ends only after the bomb goes off and we cut to Indy being interrogated by the government.
Similarly, the other prologues are compromised of many component elements, are still part of the same big scene. Raiders ends with the plane flying off, as does TOD and then there is a jump in time and location. LC ends with the Coronado sinking....and KOTCS ends with Doomtown.
So I'd agree that Doomtown is part of the prologue... I think what we were debating was the criteria for scene versus section. For me, Doomtown is a distinct and separate action sequence within the prologue (there is both a jump in time and location which denotes this). Also, I'd argue the case for KOTCS actually having the best, and most action filled prologue after
Raiders (which isn't an easy task).
Lance Quazar said:
And here is where we agree to disagree...
Though I haven't seen the film in a year, I was amazed by how LITTLE happened in the last quarter of the film. How there was so little action and so little suspense. Really, I found Akator to be an extraordinary anticlimax, ending the film on a sagging, slack note, not an energetic high like the other films.
By the time the temple collapsed and the "ship" flew away, I was unbelievably bored.
In essence, I’m not sure we disagree that much on this point (it’s probably more the how and whys?) If you let me expand… Overall, I think the ending of KOTCS (Akator section) is probably the weakest of all 4 movies to date. I think this is largely due to Spielberg/Lucas attempting an equal distribution of both the action and the emotional/philosophical elements, to create the ultimate dénouement (it must have looked great on paper). Unfortunately by doing this, it shortchanges on both the action and emotion e.g. decaying/burning villain and collapsing temple = same ole’, same ole’. Mac dying and “Knowledge was their treasure” = same ole’ same ole.
In comparison, TOD largely ignored the emotional/philosophical elements in favor of an outstanding set piece atop a rope bridge. TLC’s dénouement, with its largely pedestrian action in the final act, was underpinned by the conclusion of the emotional journey… “Let it go” i.e. true wealth/treasure is largely spiritual in nature. Indy loses the Grail, but finds his father etc.
I genuinely believe that several small (but significant) changes in the final reel, would have vastly improved KOTCS. Firstly, move the booby trap to the cemetery/Orellan’s tomb scene (to beef up the action/peril in that section). Secondly, use the additional time created by the removal of the booby trap to both re-enforce Indy/Mutt’s relationship in Akator, and to give Mac a redemption and adequate death scene. That way, the ending would have been more comparable to TLC i.e. it would have felt like the conclusion of an emotional journey, rather than simply an effects fest.