Agent Spalko
Guest
Apocalypse Now is better than GF.
agentsands77 said:I'm very well educated in film production, including writing, directing, and acting techniques.
agentsands77 said:Nothing wrong with that, but the progression you picked was rather dramatic. You could have gone:
1. The Godfather is the greatest film ever made.
2. The Godfather is a great film, but not the greatest.
3. The Godfather is a good, but not great film.
4. The Godfather isn't a very good film at all.
5. I've never seen The Godfather.
Which, IMO, presents a much better range of choices.
sandiegojones said:There's different categories of films. The Godfather is a genre film, although it's more about family than a gangster film. That's what set it apart, plus at the time gangster films were silly with actors like Jimmy Cagney. The Godfather had realism.
LostArk said:......and you know what they say:The book is always better than the movie
Agent Spalko said:Apocalypse Now is better than GF.
The Man said:Your idol Mr. Lucas was once tapped to direct Apocalypse...
He's also an uncredited screenwriter. He wrote the original draft and John Milius did the final draft.The Man said:Your idol Mr. Lucas was once tapped to direct Apocalypse...
What are you, 12? THE MATRIX? That film was a flash in the pan. Sure, the first was good and for a few years everyone tried to copy it's effects, but it's not nearly as influential and it's sequels are not even as good as the SW prequels.Gustav said:At the time? James Cagney's last gangster film was more than twenty years before The Godfather. And what's this "gangster films were silly with actors like Jimmy Cagney" stuff? You make it sound like Cagney is some sort of a clown. Gangster films of Cagney's era were exploitive, but they weren't silly. And you don't think The French Connection had realism?
Another thing I keep hearing about The Godfather is "the most influencial film of all time". Come on. The Matrix was twice as influencial on scifi and action films as The Godfather was on drama and crime films.
sandiegojones said:What are you, 12? THE MATRIX? That film was a flash in the pan. Sure, the first was good and for a few years everyone tried to copy it's effects, but it's not nearly as influential and it's sequels are not even as good as the SW prequels.
I spent 4 years of my life in film school and 3 more in the business. I've seen thousands of films. The typical gangster film was a Cagney film or Howard Hughes' "Scarface" with Paul Muny. There weren't a lot of gangster films in the 50's and 60's because films became more geared toward religious epics and Doris Day films, hence the 20 year gap you mention. The Godfather was a popular book, and stared some of the greatest actors of all time. When it was released the only name was Brando, but you cannot deny that since then Pacino, Duvall and Diane Keaton have become big stars.
Plus, the Godfather is as much a family drama as it is a gangster film. One of the things that set it apart was its graphic and realistic violence for it's time. Now video games are more violent but then this was as gritty as you get.
Like some, I think GF part II is just as good if not better, but I always give the nod to the original. Same as The Empire Strikes Back with Star Wars.
It's interesting. I don't rightly know what to make of it.The Man said:What's the consensus on Youth Without Youth? I don't think it was even released theatrically over here.
agentsands77 said:It's interesting. I don't rightly know what to make of it.
sandiegojones said:What are you, 12? THE MATRIX? That film was a flash in the pan. Sure, the first was good and for a few years everyone tried to copy it's effects, but it's not nearly as influential and it's sequels are not even as good as the SW prequels.
I spent 4 years of my life in film school and 3 more in the business. I've seen thousands of films. The typical gangster film was a Cagney film or Howard Hughes' "Scarface" with Paul Muny. There weren't a lot of gangster films in the 50's and 60's because films became more geared toward religious epics and Doris Day films, hence the 20 year gap you mention. The Godfather was a popular book, and stared some of the greatest actors of all time. When it was released the only name was Brando, but you cannot deny that since then Pacino, Duvall and Diane Keaton have become big stars.
Plus, the Godfather is as much a family drama as it is a gangster film. One of the things that set it apart was its graphic and realistic violence for it's time. Now video games are more violent but then this was as gritty as you get.
Like some, I think GF part II is just as good if not better, but I always give the nod to the original. Same as The Empire Strikes Back with Star Wars.
It depends which action films you're talking about. The Matrix-style actioner had a big heyday for a bit, but I don't think it's had any lasting influence.Gustav said:Action movies would just not be the same if The Matrix were never made and you can't deny that.
agentsands77 said:It depends which action films you're talking about. The Matrix-style actioner had a big heyday for a bit, but I don't think it's had any lasting influence.