Connery's Toupe
Guest
Is eating a fish an infringement on it's right to exist?
Was Jesus being cruel when he ate fish, his Father's creation?
Was Jesus being cruel when he ate fish, his Father's creation?
DocWhiskey said:Same as eating a cow, lamb, chicken, pig, alligator, turkey etc.
It's not Jesus's fault that animals are so delicious.
You're over analyzing. Everything serves a purpose.
DocWhiskey said:It's life.
Deal with it.
Hey, maybe you didn't kill the animal yourself, but I don't think that makes much of a difference to the fish.The_Raiders said:I don't think eating an animal is really considered killing...
So you're saying that if your mother hit a deer and killed it but she somehow died in the collsion as well, you'd be just as broken up to hear about the deer's tragic end as much as your mother's?Connery's Toupe said:It's death and I refuse to accept it. The fish is as much a living creature as Jesus was and yet the two deaths bring considerably different reactions.
DocWhiskey said:So you're saying that if your mother hit a deer and killed it but she somehow died in the collsion as well, you'd be just as broken up to hear about the deer's tragic end as much as your mother's?
I'm speaking figuratively of course.
DocWhiskey said:Exactly. Life moves on. You talk about Jesus, well, Jesus died for us, right?
Circle of life. If you live life thinking the way you're thinking about death you'll never be able to enjoy it.
Connery's Toupe said:Yes, Jesus died for us. However, I don't recall a fishy saviour for marine life sacrificing himself willingly.
Connery's Toupe said:Yes, Jesus died for us. However, I don't recall a fishy saviour for marine life sacrificing himself willingly.