Dr.Jonesy
Well-known member
I've been reading alot about the 'Prequels' lately, and comparing their reception to that of KOTCS. And the thing that strikes me the most about an article or blog about George Lucas is that when they mention him 'ruining' or 'raping' a franchise, they only mention Star Wars. And these articles are post-2008, mind you.
So why isn't KOTCS mentioned if most everyone thought it was a poor movie that raped a franchise? Do people not care about Indy at all? You'd think they'd mention it in an article about him destroying beloved franchises. This post isn't a "in defense of KOTCS" thread, by the way. Cause I'm still mixed about the film myself. I just want to know why the heck they'd leave Indy out of the argument that Lucas is a hack.
So any ideas on why people leave Indy out of the discussion? And how does the fan/general audience's reaction to KOTCS compare to the 'Prequels'?
So why isn't KOTCS mentioned if most everyone thought it was a poor movie that raped a franchise? Do people not care about Indy at all? You'd think they'd mention it in an article about him destroying beloved franchises. This post isn't a "in defense of KOTCS" thread, by the way. Cause I'm still mixed about the film myself. I just want to know why the heck they'd leave Indy out of the argument that Lucas is a hack.
So any ideas on why people leave Indy out of the discussion? And how does the fan/general audience's reaction to KOTCS compare to the 'Prequels'?
Last edited: