Crack that whip said:(Re: not so many pages for the earlier years... is it possible the reduced coverage has a good side, in that it allows for flexibility in the chronology, meaning the original version of the series is still possibly "the" version?)
TalonCard said:Considering the trouble Lucas went to in order to film bridging sequences in the "new" chronology, however flawed they may be, I think the newer versions should be a better indication of what actually happened. Any contradictions between the two can be seen as Old Indy misremembering the dates or leaving out the boring, pointless (i.e. bridging material ) parts of his life.
TC
Michael24 said:It drove me crazy until a few years later I found out in was a Young Indy episode. I'm anxious to get the last two DVD volumes so that I can finally see it.
After the preview featured on Entertainment Tonight I was completely stoked for Ford's appearanceWhen you first learned or saw Harrison's cameo as a 51 year old Indy, were you shocked? Suprised? After all, this was our first filmed Indy adventure since Last Crusade, even if it was only for ten minutes or so. I liked it, but I don't know they jumped from 1938 to 1950.
Did you like it?
You were "tyring to decide"? It's Indiana Jones!LostArk said:I was reading about the show and trying to decide whether I should watch it or not and when I found out he was in an episode, I knew I had to watch it.
Stoo said:You were "tyring to decide"? It's Indiana Jones!
Crack that whip said:I was already a regular watcher of the series (well, to the extent that I could be, given its somewhat irregular airings), so I always looked forward to each new episode anyway, but when I read about a special upcoming movie-length episode with the original Indy himself, I was even more jazzed than usual.
Way of the dodo said:I remember thinking the beginning was great but the end was lame. (and the main jazz episode would have been better as a 1hr episode than a 2)