Joe Brody said:For anything as vanilla as Peyton & the Colts, figure you should go with Miller Lite.
monkey said:But Vanilla????
Katarn07 said:Everyone says the Bears are gonna lose. But isn't that what they said about the game against the Saints? After that saftey, it wasn't even a contest. I think the players are confident enough to do well again. I just hope Grossman comes through again.
roundshort said:You were right, Grossman really came through . . ."The worst QB to ever play in the Superbowl, ever!"
IAdventurer01 said:He was bad, but to his credit, his stats reflect worse on him than he actually played. I can think of several times where he threw perfectly to an open receiver and the receiver botched his job and dropped it. Incomplete pass? I think there should be an incomplete catch category.
Joe Brody said:One likely non-winner: whatever network is carrying the game. Two dead-center mid-western cities. Funny, but one thing that could really help the game's ratings is the national audience's familiarity with Manning's funny Mastercard commercials.
"D"
"Caf"
Bump.
Bump.
"D"
"Caf"
roundshort said:You were right, Grossman really came through . . ."The worst QB to ever play in the Superbowl, ever!"
Katarn07 said:First of all, I didn't say he would. I said I hoped he did. And I really think he deserves less hating from people.
The defense is what sucked. He didn't have too many attempts with the ball. When they only had a yard to go in the third down, and he threw it rather than running it, that wasn't his fault. That was the fault of the offensive coordinator. I'm not the biggest football fan so I don't know his name. The other two crap throws of his that resulted in an interception were bad, but you know what? Manning threw one too. He just had that much more time with the ball that he was able to do some good too. I blame the defense, not just Grossman.
Thank God I'm not a football fan or I would have been super ticked off!