Dumbest Movie EVER!
- Thread starter Indyfan28
- Start date
indifan101
New member
Batman Begins. 
TombReader
New member
Napoleon Dynamite
ClintonHammond
Guest
If it's a pure and total lack of entertainment you're after Napoleon Dynamite is the movie for you...
San Holo
Active member
I just saw the movie Alexander,the 3 hour director's cut... I was expecting a cross between Braveheart and Gladiator, but instead got to see Collin Farrel bang, like 3 dudes. Not even a shot of Rosario Dawson's fun bags could save this suedo gay porn from being one of the dumbest movies I have ever seen.
ClintonHammond
Guest
Braveheart... speaking of DUMB movies!
blech
blech
Rae-deemer
New member
All of the Rocky movies. Did anybody ever notice that in the first movie the man can hardly speak, and by the third movie he's using large words.
Rumpled Fedora
Member
Napoleon Dynamite... can you say EXTREMLY OVERRATED??
ClintonHammond
Guest
I wouldn't waste my time watching that movie a 2nd time, let alone a 3rd!
I'd rather have to chew my own bung....
"Braveheart"
Was HORRIBLE! Especially considering it was marketed as The 'REAL' History of William Wallace... And it wasn't even CLOSE... It was an affront to his memory... a crappy 'cashing-in-on-culture' by a money grubbing low talent hack trying to make a name for himself with spectacle... It's all smoke and no fire... there's ZERO substance to any single frame of the film... I'm surprised that Wallace himself didn't rise up outa the ground and rodger Mel Gibson all over the fields where they filmed this atrocity... Thank the gods that Ridley Scott came along with Gladiator and cleared the awful taste that Brave-Fart left in my mouth...
I'd rather have to chew my own bung....
"Braveheart"
Was HORRIBLE! Especially considering it was marketed as The 'REAL' History of William Wallace... And it wasn't even CLOSE... It was an affront to his memory... a crappy 'cashing-in-on-culture' by a money grubbing low talent hack trying to make a name for himself with spectacle... It's all smoke and no fire... there's ZERO substance to any single frame of the film... I'm surprised that Wallace himself didn't rise up outa the ground and rodger Mel Gibson all over the fields where they filmed this atrocity... Thank the gods that Ridley Scott came along with Gladiator and cleared the awful taste that Brave-Fart left in my mouth...
Last edited:
San Holo
Active member
"Braveheart"Was HORRIBLE! Especially considering it was marketed as The 'REAL' History of William Wallace... And it wasn't even CLOSE... I'm surprised that Wallace himself didn't rise up outa the ground and rodger Mel Gibson all over the fields where they filmed this atrocity.[/QUOTE]
Braveheart is one of my favorite films, and it's story is very inspiring. I have never met a strait man who did'nt like this movie. Bet you would like to see Wallace and Mel makin' sweet love in a green feild by a babbeling brook, wouldn't ya princess?
Nobody knows the complete "REAL" story of William Wallace,not even you Sally. The main events in the film and the basic story are based on oral stories of the legendary Scot. A 14th century bard named Blind Hary first wrote his version of the story that he got from Wallace's scribe. And it is infact a pretty good rendition of Wallace as a legendary, historical figure -and the people of Scotland loved it. In Braveheart, William Wallace is presented as a kind of Scottish Nationalist super hero. In this respect, the movie was indeed accurate about the role the myth of Wallace played in history.
Braveheart is one of my favorite films, and it's story is very inspiring. I have never met a strait man who did'nt like this movie. Bet you would like to see Wallace and Mel makin' sweet love in a green feild by a babbeling brook, wouldn't ya princess?
Nobody knows the complete "REAL" story of William Wallace,not even you Sally. The main events in the film and the basic story are based on oral stories of the legendary Scot. A 14th century bard named Blind Hary first wrote his version of the story that he got from Wallace's scribe. And it is infact a pretty good rendition of Wallace as a legendary, historical figure -and the people of Scotland loved it. In Braveheart, William Wallace is presented as a kind of Scottish Nationalist super hero. In this respect, the movie was indeed accurate about the role the myth of Wallace played in history.
roundshort
Active member
Wow with so many stinkers, Howard the Duck pops into my head, maybe Legend, Working Girl . . . God so many bad movies so little time, but for the record
Ghost Busters 2 was almost as bad as Caddyshak 2 or Blues Brothers 2 or 2000 whatever they called that stinker, why when a perfect movies is made do people feel the need to follow up with crap . . .
Are you listening George!
Ghost Busters 2 was almost as bad as Caddyshak 2 or Blues Brothers 2 or 2000 whatever they called that stinker, why when a perfect movies is made do people feel the need to follow up with crap . . .
Are you listening George!
Paden
Member
Interesting twist. If we're talking terribly guilty pleasures, I would have to pick a lesser known (with good reason) fantasy flick entitled Hawk the Slayer. One of those movies that Jack Palance, who plays the villain ("Voltan" - yes, I'm serious), probably hoped would be completely forgotten. It's so horrifically bad it's entertaining. A rather amusing review of it can be found here.