TheRaider.net
 

Go Back   The Raven > The Films > Indiana Jones 5
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-17-2017, 09:18 AM   #26
Henry Jones VII
IndyFan
 
Henry Jones VII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Portugal
Posts: 231
I quite liked the cinematography on Logan. I wouldn't mind something along those lines.

Speaking of James Mangold's movies, 3:10 To Yuma is another good example of a quality photography and camera work.
Henry Jones VII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2017, 09:30 AM   #27
Udvarnoky
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiders112390
Why is it such a big deal?

Because movies are a visual medium, and what one looks like kind of matters. As I've said, I feel the choices made on Indy 4 had damaging effects on the movie's sense of immersion and ability to engage. That's a big deal in an Indiana Jones film, to my way of thinking.

I would not be nearly this passionate in my disappointment if it wasn't easily avoidable. Kaminski is an eminently skilled cinematographer who knows exactly what he's doing. There are gorgeously composed shots in Indy 4. That there's good work on display makes the damaging choices that much worse.
Udvarnoky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2017, 05:52 PM   #28
DeepSixFix
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Jones VII
I quite liked the cinematography on Logan. I wouldn't mind something along those lines.
What did you like about it? Any takeaways/lessons on how an older world-weary character (Logan) is presented?
DeepSixFix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2017, 07:43 AM   #29
Henry Jones VII
IndyFan
 
Henry Jones VII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Portugal
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeepSixFix
What did you like about it? Any takeaways/lessons on how an older world-weary character (Logan) is presented?
I liked the lighting style used, more natural and simple. A more traditional look, just like the original Indy trilogy.
Henry Jones VII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 01:21 PM   #30
seasider
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 182
In looking at some of Kaminski's work recently, I see a couple of movies he did with Spielberg where I could see a certain style work with Indy 5. With Bridge of Spies which takes place in the 60's we see Kaminski using some restraint with his backlighting and I think it works out well. There are some nice shots throughout the movie.





War Horse was arguably his most picturesque work to date.





It's pretty clear at this point that Kaminski will not emulate the look we saw from the first 3 movies but my hope is he will be able to draw from his past work and at least help make Indy 5 a movie that looks pretty.
seasider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 01:04 PM   #31
DoomsdayFAN
IndyFan
 
DoomsdayFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: I step on something. Feel like fortune cookie.
Posts: 244
I'll never understand why fans and normal people at home seem to have an easier time recreating the look or sound of something. For whatever reason, Hollywood always seems to really struggle with this. Makes no sense.

I've seen fan films that try to emulate the look of certain older films and they turn out looking almost exactly perfect. Yet Hollywood tries it and it doesn't look anything like what came before (KOTCS, etc). Makes zero freaking sense. Especially with their nearly unlimited budget.
DoomsdayFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 02:47 PM   #32
IndyBuff
IndyFan
 
IndyBuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Jones VII
I liked the lighting style used, more natural and simple. A more traditional look, just like the original Indy trilogy.

I miss the lighting of the older films. KOTCS was so bright and soft for most of the film, whereas the older Indy films used more natural light and even darkness to create an immersive atmosphere. Crystal Skull looked washed-out and soft, even in areas that should have been dark and grim. I'd love to see them tune that down for the next one.
IndyBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 04:14 PM   #33
Willie Hott
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Udvarnoky
Because movies are a visual medium, and what one looks like kind of matters. As I've said, I feel the choices made on Indy 4 had damaging effects on the movie's sense of immersion and ability to engage. That's a big deal in an Indiana Jones film, to my way of thinking.

I would not be nearly this passionate in my disappointment if it wasn't easily avoidable. Kaminski is an eminently skilled cinematographer who knows exactly what he's doing. There are gorgeously composed shots in Indy 4. That there's good work on display makes the damaging choices that much worse.
Couldn't agree more.
Willie Hott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 04:28 PM   #34
Willie Hott
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyBuff
I miss the lighting of the older films. KOTCS was so bright and soft for most of the film, whereas the older Indy films used more natural light and even darkness to create an immersive atmosphere. Crystal Skull looked washed-out and soft, even in areas that should have been dark and grim. I'd love to see them tune that down for the next one.
I feel like a lot of this criticism, which I also agree with, was due to shooting too much of the film on soundstages rather than outside in the elements. A lot of the movie felt closed in and fake because of this.
Willie Hott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2017, 01:38 PM   #35
seasider
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Hott
I feel like a lot of this criticism, which I also agree with, was due to shooting too much of the film on soundstages rather than outside in the elements. A lot of the movie felt closed in and fake because of this.

KOTCS did have a fair amount of location shooting. They shot in New Mexico, Connecticut and Hawaii. The problem was how they used certain locations. Adding unnecessary CGI vegetation to scenes like the Jungle chase sequence (filmed on location in Hawaii) probably didn't help.

I think shooting the whole movie on U.S soil was part of the issue. The movie was essentially a Hollywood production and that wasn't how they first 3 movies were done. They were shot on location in foreign countries usually working in collaboration with a British film crew. I'd like to see a return to that with Indy 5.
seasider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2017, 12:18 PM   #36
Olliana
IndyFan
 
Olliana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 237
Some scenes like the whole jungle chase look terribly washed out, especially compared to modern action movies that came out since. KOTCS's look doesn't age well at all. And is it just me or are there lots of Abram's style lens flares in the movie?

Would be cool to see an altered version with more natural colors, lighting etc., at least for a few shots with a side-by-side comparison, but I don't even think that would be feasible.
Olliana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2017, 05:10 AM   #37
DoomsdayFAN
IndyFan
 
DoomsdayFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: I step on something. Feel like fortune cookie.
Posts: 244
Things were just too bright and glossy in KOTCS. Even in the desert scenes with the sun appearing at high noon, you could STILL see the actors being lit by fake light. Makes no sense.
DoomsdayFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2017, 11:48 AM   #38
Willie Hott
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoomsdayFAN
Things were just too bright and glossy in KOTCS. Even in the desert scenes with the sun appearing at high noon, you could STILL see the actors being lit by fake light. Makes no sense.
Yes, this was definitely a part of what made the movie feel less real and organic as the others.
Willie Hott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2017, 09:41 PM   #39
seasider
IndyFan
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoomsdayFAN
Things were just too bright and glossy in KOTCS. Even in the desert scenes with the sun appearing at high noon, you could STILL see the actors being lit by fake light. Makes no sense.

Well that is one of Kaminski's trademarks. He loves strong backlighting and will often use that lighting as another keylight on the character against natural sunlight to make them look brighter. A famous example is the airport scene in Catch Me If You Can. Sometimes it looks pretty and other times it can come off looking wishy washy.
seasider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2017, 09:38 AM   #40
IndyBuff
IndyFan
 
IndyBuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by seasider
Well that is one of Kaminski's trademarks. He loves strong backlighting and will often use that lighting as another keylight on the character against natural sunlight to make them look brighter. A famous example is the airport scene in Catch Me If You Can. Sometimes it looks pretty and other times it can come off looking wishy washy.

It works well in some films but Indy calls for more natural lighting and darker interiors. I can appreciate the style but it didn't mesh well with this franchise.
IndyBuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 PM.