emtiem said:
I don't have to back it up and say it definitely could have happened as we saw it: I'm just saying there's reasonable doubt there as to whether it's possible.
It's easy to say you don't have to back it up AND whine about snide comments, (as you see it) vs backing it up. Although pretty self serving. Glad you cleared that up!
emtiem said:
You've utterly failed to grasp what's going on here. Read the first post again; kongisking said "have fun and just imagine, for a brief moment, how this could possibly work?". To understand that sentence is neither brain surgery nor rocket science, Rocket Surgeon.
Utterly failed to grasp! That's GOLDEN. Whereas you feel justified in confining me SOLELY to the thread's springboard, what you've utterly failed to grasp is what goes on in a message board. A right which I'm fully exercizing: to express my consternation with a subject I consider utterly stupid and worthy, I guess from your volumes on the subject, for THEM. Members who are devoid of grey matter having emptied them, emtiem.
emtiem said:
If we're accepting the Mythbusters life raft thing as proof that the Temple raft escape can work, despite them changing every single variable in order to make it more possible, then why the hell would I have to say what yield the bomb is?
Having a hard time staightening out your thoughts? Temple is just as guilty. Way to comprehend things.
emtiem said:
Why are you so singularly incapable of reading in my and other posts that it 'depends on the size of the bomb'? It may be possible if the bomb was a fairly low yield. Read my post above where I give examples of objects and even men surviving blasts.
Yeah, Like the example of Marion faling "a couple of stories and surviving"? A person can fall FIVE and survive, not to mention Horus' skirt offset someof the velocity, and that pesky little point of her fall being two stories MAX. No I still don't accept your "examples".
emtiem said:
You can only PROVE it's impossible by giving me examples of people in lead-lined fridges being killed at the same distance and from the same yield bomb as in the film- until you can provide this, (as I say) YOU CANT, BACK UP your witless little comments bashing everyone who's having a fun time talking about this.
Sure I can, Spoiler:
but what's the point of explaining things to Kool Aid drinking fktards? |
Well either I'm picking on you or everyone sweetheart which is it? (Please look up the concept of "Universal YOU") This IS fun to talk about!
emtiem said:
Oh don't be so pathetic as to lie.
'Snide' means to be maliciously derogatory and to show haughty disdain. Obviously you find 'us folks unbelievable' in a nice way. Sorry, I mean some of us 'idiots'. What a charmer.
You know what? Snide also means: communicated without humor, which you are sorely lacking, and as you're so competent at comprehending things, I quoted a part of a post I agreed with jackass! Pathetic indeed, I won't be so bold to say I'm playing chess, but put down the jacks and at least play checkers! Duh.
emtiem said:
Pray tell how you mean everybody to take you calling us 'idiots', then? Is there some definition of the word 'idiot' that's in some way complementary in modern society that I've not come across before? I can't believe you don't even have the backbone to stand behind your own snide little comments. I've already used the word, but it is truly pathetic.
Fool, Surely you understand a sequence of events, cause and effect? To take a humorous quote and use it as an emotional tampon is causality. But, to assert I don't have the backbone to stand behind the usage of idiot without first waiting for a response to your objection of the use lends itself to my point regarding cause and effect. Which of my posts ducked the usage of the term "idiots"? Maybe you should go back to praying...
emtiem said:
I've seen your ridiculous outbursts on this board before and I do have to wonder how you even function as a member of society.
I could ask the same of your perception of time: cause and effect!
emtiem said:
Don't bother replying with more puerile insults: I'm not interested in an argument and as soon as this is posted I'll be looking for an 'ignore' function on this board so I don't have to endure any more of your moronic and inflammatory posts.
THAT's a good one, you can just pursue the enlightened reflections of the cultivated concerning surviving a nuclear blast from the inside of a refrigerator!
emtiem said:
I'll happily continue talking to anyone else about this subject, though, as I was having fun talking about it in a sensible manner, and I thank kongisking for coming up with a fun idea for thread.
Yeah, THANKS "kongisking"!
Bottom line: You can't survive a nuclear blast in side a refrigerator!