TheMan said:Yes, it's tough to judge these possibilities on paper. I give 4 my full anticipation, be it hope, naivity, whatever. But if cinema's greatest hero hides in a f**king fridge, you won't see the screen for all the flying vomit. DEATH TO THE SAUCERMEN!
ResidentAlien said:Lol, I take that as an insult.
Yet a thoroughly half-baked (PUN-O-RAMA!) one, so I'm not really worried.
If you can't tell the difference between childish irritability and constructive criticism, that's your own damned problem.
Dr.Sartorius said:This thread is more hilarious than the "Indy's doesn't have gun in KOTCS?" thread.
We have a character named "MUTT" in the new movie and some of you are actually surprised and disappointed when we get this other obvious reference to Raiders?
Here's some advice: pretend like this movie's not happening and go see Chronicles of Narnia instead.
Darth Vile said:One of the more frustrating aspects about forum boards like this is that people don't spend time reading what's been posted before.
It's already been stated that hiding in a fridge is no more ludicrous than hanging onto the underneath of a truck, jumping from a plane on an inflatable life raft or using an upturned coffin to escape a fiery death. If anyone is going to post about the fridge being a bad idea again (which is of course your prerogative), please have the wit to reason why it?s worse than anything else that?s appeared in an Indiana Jones movie before. At least that way we can have an intelligent debate...
replican't said:Whats white and whippy?
Indiana Fridge