Z dweller
Well-known member
I agree with you, but now you are contradicting yourself.TheFirebird1 said:A good actor doesn't equal a good performance, or a good box office run for that matter.
In the previous post you said "the success of a film with alternating storylines will depend on how good the new actor is. If he isn't good, the movie will tank."
All I'm saying is: without a young actor, it's going to be incredibly hard to engage younger audiences.
Should Disney go for an established star, or a new name?
That's a different discussion though, not the one you and I have had so far.
I'd be happy with 50/50 screen time.TheFirebird1 said:My view is that Indy 5--if they go the route of alternating storylines--should focus more on Ford, with the new actor receiving a fair amount, though slightly less than Ford's, of screentime. From your posts, it seems that you think the opposite (spend most of the time on new guy, with 40 minutes of Ford).
What the heck, even 60% Ford, 40% new actor.