The Man said:
Darth Vile said:I think that's more an indication of the proportion of evident effects shots. TDK aside (and Australia?), those other movies on the list have more overt visual effects (not tangibly better). Wouldn’t you agree?
The Man said:Whatever the criteria, Skull is the only Indy movie not to get a shot at the Visual Effects Oscar. A sense of sadness pervades...
The Man said:.
Given the movie's production history and the 'understanding' that CG would be kept to a minimum, doesn't every effect shot feel overt to the viewer as a result..?
aJakeinthePlane said:the lighting in cinematography were the pleasant surprises for me. it was nice to see that they pulled it off w/o slocombe. although its still not the same.
The Golden Idol said:I was actually really disappointed with this. Everything looked pale green!
Dr. Round said:Kaminski gave us overexposed bubblegum, complete with lens flares that were far too noticeable.
tocksic said:
The Man said:
KVoss said:I thought maybe music, sound FX editing or SOMETHING...
The Man said:Whatever the criteria, Skull is the only Indy movie not to get a shot at the Visual Effects Oscar. A sense of sadness pervades...
The Man said:Given the movie's production history and the 'understanding' that CG would be kept to a minimum, doesn't every effect shot feel overt to the viewer as a result..?