bob
New member
'allo
The trilogy have very little to do with the real world, the Nazis are cartoon villains, the whole colonial questions ultimately come down to the fact that the Indians are all cultists/in need of a messiah. And America is presented as just one big suburbia with a dotty englishman running the local museam. The trilogy could have been set at any time between the wars.
There has been a lot of discussion about Indy IV having something to do with the real world in the 50's such as McCarthyism, a rather more complex presentatation of Cold war, the untrustworthiness of government, Indy becoming more 'human'.
So the question is, is it time for the trilogy to rise above being a popcorn film and look into (or at least acknowledge) the issues that were important at the time; or at least seek to be based in the real world. Or maybe that isnt Indys place.....
The trilogy have very little to do with the real world, the Nazis are cartoon villains, the whole colonial questions ultimately come down to the fact that the Indians are all cultists/in need of a messiah. And America is presented as just one big suburbia with a dotty englishman running the local museam. The trilogy could have been set at any time between the wars.
There has been a lot of discussion about Indy IV having something to do with the real world in the 50's such as McCarthyism, a rather more complex presentatation of Cold war, the untrustworthiness of government, Indy becoming more 'human'.
So the question is, is it time for the trilogy to rise above being a popcorn film and look into (or at least acknowledge) the issues that were important at the time; or at least seek to be based in the real world. Or maybe that isnt Indys place.....