Heliograph
New member
The filing system around here is all wrong. There's a category "film classics," but no category "book classics." Is no one aware that books preceded films and Indiana Jones owes as much to books as films?
Take for instance "Congo." In "Congo," Michael Crichton draws on his anthropology background and fascination with new technology to create "Congo," a best-selling novel about a search for industrial diamonds and a new race of gorillas. The novel, patterned after the adventure writings of H. Ryder Haggard. And Haggard got his impetus from "Lost World" by Arthur Conan Doyle.
Haggard is all about "Fortune and Glory," lost civilizations and history. Somehow the history part got dropped by whomever wrote the screenplay. You can't write a Indiana Jones-esque story without a lost civilization and some knowledge of history. You really can't have a good lost civilization without referencing history. It has to be anchored to something plausible somehow.
So, there should be a category "Book Classics" or at least "History."
Take for instance "Congo." In "Congo," Michael Crichton draws on his anthropology background and fascination with new technology to create "Congo," a best-selling novel about a search for industrial diamonds and a new race of gorillas. The novel, patterned after the adventure writings of H. Ryder Haggard. And Haggard got his impetus from "Lost World" by Arthur Conan Doyle.
Haggard is all about "Fortune and Glory," lost civilizations and history. Somehow the history part got dropped by whomever wrote the screenplay. You can't write a Indiana Jones-esque story without a lost civilization and some knowledge of history. You really can't have a good lost civilization without referencing history. It has to be anchored to something plausible somehow.
So, there should be a category "Book Classics" or at least "History."