Montana Smith said:
You were there or you weren't there?
I'm lost.
I thought Giza was one of the places central to your theory/knowledge. If it's hard to talk about, then I'd think the whole alien thing would also be off-topic.
That's going to be very hard, because the skeptics among us aren't sure what we're dealing with. At first you claimed that you had "knowledge of the alien reality", and now you've left us further contradictory messages.
This topic would have gone better if it was begun with the idea that these are theories, rather than realities. Since skeptics can happily discuss theory, but will find it difficult when the line between theory and reality is blurred - even more so when when it is impossible on a message board to pin down the truth of any personal statement.
Hi, Montana.
Again, the NN's that posted before you are taking things out of context. I say things like "maybe I was there" in the same context as possibilities as to what happened there. Yes, I'm being deliberately vague about having been to Giza because I already said that I didn't want to talk about it. What so many on this thread seem to like to do is take an example or a suggestion and put words in my mouth. So, the only way to deal with such nonsense is to deliberately muddy the waters.
Besides, my having been to the Giza site or not is immaterial here. According to the skeptics, it's all about research. I wonder if ResidentAlien, Gabeed and Stoo have ALL been to the Giza site and laid eyes directly on everything that pertains to this subject. Yet they speak with authority as if they have, when I suspect their "knowledge", at best, came from books and not personal experience. Why should I be any different? They seem to think I should be, so I just throw 'em red herrings now. Been doing it longer than they realize, in fact. After all, they're going to wist and take out of context anything I say anyway. So, if I bother to reply to one of their posts, please take it as just screwing with them -- They've proven they're not going to respect anything I say anyway.
Originally I said maybe I'd been there, maybe I hadn't. When Stoo challenged that, I said yes, I have (I still had some respect for him at that point), and I didn't wish to discuss it further. Out of charity I did (discuss it further). But, it's my right to be non-specific about my personal experiences. I've already offered a hell of a lot, and my experiences aren't the central issue anyway. It's the evidence everyone and anyone can look at if they choose to that is important -- Giza, and many other things. Research in any field, ufology included, isn't nice and neat. It's a puzzle. Sure, it'd be so simple and easy if I had supernatural experiences at the Giza site that directly connected with my other experiences, but that's not the case. And I never said it was. But morons (not you -- others) seem to always want a convenient, simple, quick story. Yet they profess to be students of history. History isn't nice and neat. Their feeble efforts of trying to put words into my mouth of having had paranormal experiences in Giza is a clear window into their shallow mind-set of just wanting the mystery to go away, to assume quick command over this intrusion upon their reality, to have "solved the puzzle" without any time and effort.
Stoo, Gabeed and ResidentAlien try to twist everything to support a pre-determined "conclusion". What I've said about being at the Giza site is an example of this. I'm sorry it got confusing. As I've said before, I seem to spend more time on this thread dealing with morons like them than being able to address issues. I'm only human and have finite patience and time. As one (anonymous) reader of this thread said when he emailed me privately (as many have), if only these guys spent half the time into checking the stories that they do into causing trouble . . .
I mean, look at how this thread has gone to whether or not I've been to the Giza site, rather than if ALIENS have been there!!!! And, I might add, when the Eastern European mural was "debunked", I questioned the source, the reporter, and his bias, and immediately the morons on this thread said the source wasn't the issue, but the facts (literally) written upon the wall. Well (speaking to the skeptics in general . . .) which is it? If the source isn't the issue, why all the fuss over me and Giza? Shall we discuss whether ALIENS WERE AT GIZA, the topic of this thread, or do we have to revisit those murals with the skeptics having, by their own insistence of questioning THIS messenger, thus throw out the so-called "debunking" of the cosmic mural due to my questioning of ITS messenger?
See? Skeptics want things both ways. Hardly scientific.
Sorry for the long-winded answer. I try to be thorough. But, since my long-winded answer will doubtless be picked through for sound-bytes the others can twist out of context, let me also provide a short version:
Short version: I deliberately mix words about my Giza presence in order to avoid discussing a personal issue because I've already said I don't like to talk about it.
In closing, your last bit about my initial approaching this is theory rather than fact would have been better. I've said that before in this post. But I can easily say it again: I came on too strong and if that threw anyone off, I admit that error. I just hope that some folks can understand my motive: Having had close encounters, for me, this *is* a reality. I can certainly understand others not believing it due to not experiencing it (and society's authorities really don't do anything to introduce people to it), and I don't blame them. I actually envy them. It's not a comfortable thing to live with. It's like a combat veteran's PTS or a rape victim. Others can't fathom what it's like. But, at the least, they should be respectful. You are, and others are. Some, unfortunately, have neither respect nor maturity.
Rocket Surgeon said:
Hence the close encounter...am I right Matt? Touring Giza inside an out would be a cinch with a certain "tour guide", (pardon the levity please).
Hi, Rocket Surgeon.
No, my close encounters have little to do with Giza. As I said, the only connection there is that my close encounters from years prior broadened my mind so I could see the Giza site objectively, not encumbered by any dogmatic "history".