Yeah, the Entertainment Weekly review criticizes the filmmakers for playing it safe and not taking enough risks. I don't want risks!IrishLuck1980 said:All I want is another Indiana Jones movie. Don't need the Big 3 to reinvent the wheel.
Taking everything I've read so far, good and bad. It sounds like exactly the movie I was hoping for...Skipper said:Yeah, the Entertainment Weekly review criticizes the filmmakers for playing it safe and not taking enough risks. I don't want risks!
It's funny. EW criticizes the movie for too much action. Others criticize it for too much down time. It just goes to show that it's impossible to please everyone.
Yeah, all the bad is the same stuff said about the others 25 years ago. the good the same. Seems like what I want from Indy.G-Man said:Taking everything I've read so far, good and bad. It sounds like exactly the movie I was hoping for...
Apart from the logo dissolve...
They're video gamers, not critics. They're no better than AICN.triklops said:The IGN review just ruined my day
Their big criticism is they never felt like Indy was in danger. I really don't even understand what this means. In TOD or LC, viewers weren't exactly convinced that Indy was about to die. Oh well.triklops said:The IGN review just ruined my day
Well, in "Raiders" Indy really doesn't have to much to with the demise of the Nazi's. If Indy was never there, the Nazi's would have eventually found the Ark and they still would have died when they opened it. It's just a plot device for action.Skipper said:Their big criticism is they never felt like Indy was in danger. I really don't even understand what this means. In TOD or LC, viewers weren't exactly convinced that Indy was about to die. Oh well.
It's The Sun that said negative reviewers might be lying. That wasn't a Ravener's comment.triklops said:How come people welcome EVERY positive review but when it comes to the negative ones all you hear is "They are lying" or stuff like that....???
Skipper said:It's The Sun that said negative reviewers might be lying. That wasn't a Ravener's comment.
It's nice to hear such a good review from an Indy fan.Munpa said:The Sun:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/film/article1178027.ece
"So was it worth the wait? ...Absolutely."
If you're referring to the "reviews" on AICN or Chud, it's because so many of those were obviously fake. If you're referring to these real reviews, well, I don't accuse them of lying. Nothing they say makes me worried, a lot of it confirms for me that this is an Indy movie just like the others.How come people welcome EVERY positive review but when it comes to the negative ones all you hear is "They are lying" or stuff like that....???