Considerably less. There's a lot of good evidence for Mutt being Indy's son (including the fact that Mutt is just the right age to be Indy's, always a telling sign), but there isn't a whole lot of solid evidence for Hurt being Abner.oki9Sedo said:There's even less evidence for that than there is for Mutt being Indy's son.
No, I wouldn't like him to play Abner. Abner should stay dead... I don't want there to be some convoluted "Oh, he was actually alive" storyline. But I'm not too worried... I don't really believe that he is playing Abner.Dr. Gonzo said:Yes I know there is not much proof that he will play Abner in the film, but my question was would you prefer it if he did? I wanted to know who thinks what.
Thank ya, sir.Dr. Gonzo said:Nice name by the way agentsands77, nice name.
He's definitely the best part of that film. "I don't hear you running."Dr. Gonzo said:I love how he wears a C.I.A. shirt to the bullfight. Priceless
salussolia said:what if ox is actually abner
i didnt hahaDr. Gonzo said:Interesting thoughts in this poll. How did you vote?
barranca said:I went for 'I don't care..' Personally I think a 'new' character would be good. One we haven't heard of (or have but overlooked). I've never felt John was 'right' for Abner.
I would have cast someone like Judd Hirsch.....
I think looks wise, it makes much more sense. You can sort of see a family resemblance going down through Marion to Mutt.
Ah Well!
I've nothing against John Hurt he's a fine actor, I can only think they went for someone who looks like they've spent ages just about surviving in that jungle.