sarah navarro said:HA! from the power of the Crystal skull.
Indy says:
"Marion Will you...BOOM!!"Hmmmm.... i guess not i guess i'll have to marry Indy Chic now".
otto rahn said:I'd like to see him propose just before something drastic happens to seperate them; then we have to wait until the end of the film for the answer !
Violet Indy said:Yeah, but it wouldn't fit with the games for starters (FoA in set in '39 and Infernal Machine in '47 and Indy is evidently single and Sophia Hapgood is in those) and the comics (the Dark Horse ones more so than the Marvels), unless they suddenly got married during WW2 and broke up before Infernal Machine. So that would be roughly, 1940 till about 1946 if at all. Or later, Say after Infernal Machine so anywhere between 1948 onwards till '57 since there is no canon in those years to dispute. Those are the years we don't know much about Indy's life. So yeah, it's possible but I don't think so somehow.
Then you would have to some kind of backstory as to how they got back together and ended up married (and IF Mutt is Indy's son, then Indy will have already known about him in KOTCS).... Oh wait, that could be how the new game has a prologue to this movie. After all, the rumoured MacGuffin of that game DOES relate to the Ark of the Covenant.
but she got killed in a plane crash in the Amazon |
Rivers said:Has anyone else maybe thought that Indy and Marion have already been married sometime between 1936 and 1957 and it just didnt work????
I agree with you on the cameo fitting point. But why would they put Willie and Short Round into KOTCS? I know, I know... It's a wedding scene and Shorty was like a son to Indy, but still I wouldn't like to see them in KOTCS... I'm not sure about Sallah and Henry Sr. either... But Marion is alright. If there will be a wedding scene (which I hope there won't be, because I think it would hurt the feeling of an Indy film) I think it would be best if there were only Indy and Marion (and maybe Mutt)...TheFox said:I guess the main point of a wedding scene would be if they have to fit multiple secret cameos (Sean Connery, John Rhys-Davies, Kate Capshaw, Ke Huy Quan). If they have 0 or 1 it could be done without a wedding scene but for 2 or more it would probably be the only solution.
On the other hand, why film a scene like that in the first place if the main idea is to cause the geekiest of us a few extra geekasms, as it may have no relevance to the rest of the plot. Cameos are nice, if they're fitting to the scene, not the other way around.TheFox said:I guess the main point of a wedding scene would be if they have to fit multiple secret cameos (Sean Connery, John Rhys-Davies, Kate Capshaw, Ke Huy Quan). If they have 0 or 1 it could be done without a wedding scene but for 2 or more it would probably be the only solution.