Pistol Whipped said:Not to debate semantics here, but I didn't insult anyone. Misrepresenting someone in print is libel. However, if there's an insult there, then I didn't say it - all I did was quote Nurhachi, and therefore the negativity is clearly stemming from his words and not mine.
You posted a picture of a jackass, man. You don't have a case.
Look, the incongruity you point out is a valid one. And if you go through the archives you'll find that the member in question has certainly not gone without criticism. (It's also worth noting clearly that the particular behavior of his that you had a problem with has nothing to do with the rules of the forum. Inconsistencies and strange priorities aren't exactly actionable offenses. As an aside: haunting the forum is fine, but you can't expect your criticism of folks here to be taken kindly if you appear as a newcomer, and with the amount we've had a chance to hear from you, that's likely how you will be perceived.)
Look, you did something insulting, he did something insulting. Both of your posts got deleted. Let's learn from this, fellas.
Oh, and for everyone, since there's been a fair amount of this going around: funny little pictures preceded by an equals sign really don't count as argument, whether you're pointing at a Ravener or KotCS or whatever. We only get rid of them when they're insulting to other members or when they're flat out offensive, but they just make you look like you're not willing to discuss things like reasonable human beings. And that just brings us all down.