Face_Melt
Well-known member
I know, my example was just simplifying things overall.They're billion-dollar corporations. They don't "share." They have teams of high-priced attorneys battle for every single scrap they can get.
I know, my example was just simplifying things overall.They're billion-dollar corporations. They don't "share." They have teams of high-priced attorneys battle for every single scrap they can get.
Thus does seem more likely than the Iron Man 3 scenario.If I'm not mistaken the only rights Paramount has is the first 4 films but any future Indy film including Indy 5 Paramount only owns A Marketing share. So I would think like the Star Wars movies we only get a Lucasfilm logo or a Disney Castle dissolves into a castle?
The idea of the Disney Castle merging into that castle with the Nazi banners would be a pretty... um.... daring? bold? idiotic?.... move by Disney.Disney's logo is a castle. And they have been filming at a real castle.
I'm just saying
It won’t happen. No Disney castle over Lucasfilm movies.The idea of the Disney Castle merging into that castle with the Nazi banners would be a pretty... um.... daring? bold? idiotic?.... move by Disney.
Thus does seem more likely than the Iron Man 3 scenario.
who says we see the Nazi flags in the merge? Mangold Is a creative Director I am sure he can figure it out...The idea of the Disney Castle merging into that castle with the Nazi banners would be a pretty... um.... daring? bold? idiotic?.... move by Disney.
I thought the prairie dog hill in KotCS was fun but people here complained about it so now we don't get a mountain in DoD. (And people complain about that.)this one stings
I thought the prairie dog hill in KotCS was fun but people here complained about it so now we don't get a mountain in DoD. (And people complain about that.)
Is there a source confirming Mangold forgot, and that it wasn't a deliberate choice by the filmmakers?idk, Mangold did forget the 'Location, Year' part. He probably just forgot.
Nah, it was deliberate. There was more jumping back and forth in this film and the filmmakers probably thought it would just start to get messy. We'd need France 1944, New York 1969, Oxford 1951 then (possibly) Tangiers 1969 then Sicily 214BC and then maybe another New York 1969 - they rightly thought it'd be overload.idk, Mangold did forget the 'Location, Year' part. He probably just forgot.
You realize that had nothing to do with it, right?I thought the prairie dog hill in KotCS was fun but people here complained about it so now we don't get a mountain in DoD. (And people complain about that.)
No, you wouldn't "need" all of those. Other Indy films only had one date/location card, despite the fact that every one took place in multiple locales. They didn't flash multiple cards every time the narrative shifted location.Nah, it was deliberate. There was more jumping back and forth in this film and the filmmakers probably thought it would just start to get messy. We'd need France 1944, New York 1969, Oxford 1951 then (possibly) Tangiers 1969 then Sicily 214BC and then maybe another New York 1969 - they rightly thought it'd be overload.
Well, the other films set the tradition of always marking a year jump (admittedly it was only Crusade that needed to do this!) so you'd probably need to do it at least once for every time you went to a new year - so at the very least that would mean 1944, 1969, 1951, and there'd certainly be an argument that if you're doing these three, then 214BC would warrant one, too.No, you wouldn't "need" all of those. Other Indy films only had one date/location card, despite the fact that every one took place in multiple locales. They didn't flash multiple cards every time the narrative shifted location.
I'm still (mildly) annoyed DoD killed this tradition.
Sorry, I forgot that LC had two of 'em because of the flashback/time jump!Well, the other films set the tradition of always marking a year jump (admittedly it was only Crusade that needed to do this!)
Is there a source confirming Mangold forgot, and that it wasn't a deliberate choice by the filmmakers?
I must admit, on that first viewing I missed the full credits at the beginning and the location/year marker - it felt like an unnecessary change to an established formula. If there'd been one for France 1944, then it would have felt weird not having one stating New York 1969. I agree, they might just have got away with these two and not bothered with any subsequent text (though it might have felt odd not having an Oxford 1951).Sorry, I forgot that LC had two of 'em because of the flashback/time jump!
I would have been fine with one. Or with two. No need for the one during the 1951 flashback, that would have been jarring and unnecessary. Same with during the Siege of Syracuse.
I was not okay with zero!