kongisking
Active member
James said:Actually, you may have hit upon the cause of Henry Sr.'s death here. Perhaps one morning over tea, the gunshot simply reopened?
Say, that actually sounds fairly plausible...good thinking!
James said:Actually, you may have hit upon the cause of Henry Sr.'s death here. Perhaps one morning over tea, the gunshot simply reopened?
Darth Vile said:Yep. I have no issue with seeing an "offshoot" movie, but for me it would be comparable, in concept, with an Ewok or Droids movie i.e. interesting in theory, but almost impossible to make it better than the original premise. If there are to be more movies based around a man in a hat dodging booby traps in ancient tombs, I'd much rather it be Indiana Jones (be that with a different actor, cartoon or whatever) than "Son of", "Bride of" or "Distant cousin of"...
Besides, as much as I love Ford as Indiana Jones, it seems such as simple step to take him back to his first adventures that I can't believe it won't happen. There are a wealth of characters to re-introduce... be that Henry Jones Senior, Belloq, Sallah, Abner Ravenwood, Oxley, Brody etc. etc. It seems crazy not to give it a go... at some point...
I think the Indy universe is only as limited as the universe of Bond, Batman, Superman etc. There is no reason, unless they remove it too far from it's original premise, that Indy can't have more adventures over the next 30 years (I mean they've had multiple movies out of Harry Potter and Spiderman).
Moedred said:No macguffin agreement?
Where was this quote recorded?
Lucas: "Steven and I are talking about it, and Harrison, and hopefully we'll figure it out. It's hard to figure out what the movie should be about. We all have ideas and hopefully we'll come to a conclusion on it at some point."
Moedred said:No macguffin agreement?
Where was this quote recorded?
Lucas: "Steven and I are talking about it, and Harrison, and hopefully we'll figure it out. It's hard to figure out what the movie should be about. We all have ideas and hopefully we'll come to a conclusion on it at some point."
Dr.Sartorius said:Yeah I thought Lucas said previously that he had come up with another mcguffin.
Perhilion said:"definitely"? we got an Indy IV, didn't we?
arkfinder said:I think it's all rubbish. I think they do have an ideal in mind and their not going to spill the beans.
Good for them!
I think it's a given that they have the ideas... it's just a question of getting those ideas into a single coherent plot/story. I assume that's the bit they are trying to hammer out at the moment. I assume a lot of this pre-pre production consists of numerous parallel activity/tasks, so there is a good chance that there are other things happening behind the scenes too (that we have zero visibility of).arkfinder said:I think it's all rubbish. I think they do have an ideal in mind and their not going to spill the beans.
Good for them!
If so, then don't call it Indiana Jones. Call it Mutt Jones, like I've said over and over again on this forum.tnswman said:This is from Fox news.
"I haven?t even told Steven or Harrison this," he said. "But I have an idea to make Shia [LeBeouf] the lead character next time and have Harrison [Ford] come back like Sean Connery did in the last movie. I can see it working out.
If so, then why are you making Mutt the main character?tnswman said:"And it?s not like Harrison is even old. I mean, he?s 65 and he did everything in this movie. The old chemistry is there, and it?s not like he?s an old man. He?s incredibly agile; he looks even better than he did 20 years ago, if you ask me."
NOOOOOOOO!!! I will murder whoever said that if they do it(looking at you George)!!!"I haven?t even told Steven or Harrison this," he said. "But I have an idea to make Shia [LeBeouf] the lead character next time and have Harrison [Ford] come back like Sean Connery did in the last movie. I can see it working out.